In response to: Cook C. How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation? [1]
I’d like to thank James Dunning, Anita Gross, Charlie Goldsmith, Toby Hall, Ken Olson, Valerie Phelps, Philip Sizer Jr, and Jean-Michel Brismée, for contributing their invited responses to my recent editorial titled ‘How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation’. I invited these individuals b...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37814 |
| _version_ | 1848755151138979840 |
|---|---|
| author | Hall, Toby |
| author_facet | Hall, Toby |
| author_sort | Hall, Toby |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | I’d like to thank James Dunning, Anita Gross, Charlie Goldsmith, Toby Hall, Ken Olson, Valerie Phelps, Philip Sizer Jr, and Jean-Michel Brismée, for contributing their invited responses to my recent editorial titled ‘How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation’. I invited these individuals because I appreciate their contributions toward policy, evidence, and teaching, and desired to fully represent multiple viewpoints. As you can see by the responses, thoughts regarding the continued debate of thrust versus non-thrust are as polarizing as ever, and based on these responses, one can see that one answer does not fully cover all the questions on this issue. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T08:51:44Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-37814 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T08:51:44Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-378142018-03-29T09:06:49Z In response to: Cook C. How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation? [1] Hall, Toby I’d like to thank James Dunning, Anita Gross, Charlie Goldsmith, Toby Hall, Ken Olson, Valerie Phelps, Philip Sizer Jr, and Jean-Michel Brismée, for contributing their invited responses to my recent editorial titled ‘How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation’. I invited these individuals because I appreciate their contributions toward policy, evidence, and teaching, and desired to fully represent multiple viewpoints. As you can see by the responses, thoughts regarding the continued debate of thrust versus non-thrust are as polarizing as ever, and based on these responses, one can see that one answer does not fully cover all the questions on this issue. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37814 10.1179/1066981712Z.00000000013 restricted |
| spellingShingle | Hall, Toby In response to: Cook C. How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation? [1] |
| title | In response to: Cook C. How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation? [1] |
| title_full | In response to: Cook C. How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation? [1] |
| title_fullStr | In response to: Cook C. How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation? [1] |
| title_full_unstemmed | In response to: Cook C. How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation? [1] |
| title_short | In response to: Cook C. How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation? [1] |
| title_sort | in response to: cook c. how about a little love for non-thrust manipulation? [1] |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37814 |