The Philosophical History of Punishment and Imprisonment

Historically, people have been detained in custodial institutions deemed appropriate no matter how deplorable their conditions. Criminality, considered an illness, was treated by segregated punishment and to varying degrees crime, morality, mental health and religion was deemed somewhat interrelated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jonescu, Emil
Format: Journal Article
Published: Curtin University 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37588
_version_ 1848755090889900032
author Jonescu, Emil
author_facet Jonescu, Emil
author_sort Jonescu, Emil
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Historically, people have been detained in custodial institutions deemed appropriate no matter how deplorable their conditions. Criminality, considered an illness, was treated by segregated punishment and to varying degrees crime, morality, mental health and religion was deemed somewhat interrelated, Therefore prisons, mental institutions, hospitals and ecclesiastical architecture share philosophical and historical infrastructure. Associated discourse among social reformers established concurrent inter-continental evolutionary threads of 'innovative' proposals, philosophies and architecture specific to incarceration. Conversely, within the West Australian criminal justice system, police lock-ups exist to facilitate temporary detainment of people yet to be proved guilty of an offence. This paper forms the basis of one chapter of my PhD research that discusses the requirements of WA police short-term custodial facilities and calls for contemporary initiatives and a shift in attitudes to acknowledge that dissimilar institutions require different accommodation structures which necessitate a distinctive functional form. Existing deficiencies in specialist literature acknowledging the anomalous complexity of lock-up function indicates constant insufficient consideration of short-term custodial architecture research compared with other institutional typologies that have rapidly spectalised and evolved. Yet social and academic castigation ensure that retrospective adaptive implementation of unrealised conceptions and philosophies remain dismissed and untested.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:50:47Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-37588
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:50:47Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Curtin University
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-375882017-01-30T14:04:36Z The Philosophical History of Punishment and Imprisonment Jonescu, Emil Historically, people have been detained in custodial institutions deemed appropriate no matter how deplorable their conditions. Criminality, considered an illness, was treated by segregated punishment and to varying degrees crime, morality, mental health and religion was deemed somewhat interrelated, Therefore prisons, mental institutions, hospitals and ecclesiastical architecture share philosophical and historical infrastructure. Associated discourse among social reformers established concurrent inter-continental evolutionary threads of 'innovative' proposals, philosophies and architecture specific to incarceration. Conversely, within the West Australian criminal justice system, police lock-ups exist to facilitate temporary detainment of people yet to be proved guilty of an offence. This paper forms the basis of one chapter of my PhD research that discusses the requirements of WA police short-term custodial facilities and calls for contemporary initiatives and a shift in attitudes to acknowledge that dissimilar institutions require different accommodation structures which necessitate a distinctive functional form. Existing deficiencies in specialist literature acknowledging the anomalous complexity of lock-up function indicates constant insufficient consideration of short-term custodial architecture research compared with other institutional typologies that have rapidly spectalised and evolved. Yet social and academic castigation ensure that retrospective adaptive implementation of unrealised conceptions and philosophies remain dismissed and untested. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37588 Curtin University restricted
spellingShingle Jonescu, Emil
The Philosophical History of Punishment and Imprisonment
title The Philosophical History of Punishment and Imprisonment
title_full The Philosophical History of Punishment and Imprisonment
title_fullStr The Philosophical History of Punishment and Imprisonment
title_full_unstemmed The Philosophical History of Punishment and Imprisonment
title_short The Philosophical History of Punishment and Imprisonment
title_sort philosophical history of punishment and imprisonment
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37588