Integrated in situ zircon U–Pb age and Hf–O isotopes for the Helanshan khondalites in North China Craton: Juvenile crustal materials deposited in active or passive continental margin?

The Khondalite Belt, one of the three major Paleoproterozoic mobile belts in the North China Craton, consists mainly of khondalite suite and S-type granites. It is thought to be a continental collision belt along which the Yinshan and Ordos Blocks amalgamated to form the Western Block of the North C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dan, W., Li, X., Guo, J., Liu, Y., Wang, Xuan-Ce
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier BV 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37229
_version_ 1848754989167542272
author Dan, W.
Li, X.
Guo, J.
Liu, Y.
Wang, Xuan-Ce
author_facet Dan, W.
Li, X.
Guo, J.
Liu, Y.
Wang, Xuan-Ce
author_sort Dan, W.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The Khondalite Belt, one of the three major Paleoproterozoic mobile belts in the North China Craton, consists mainly of khondalite suite and S-type granites. It is thought to be a continental collision belt along which the Yinshan and Ordos Blocks amalgamated to form the Western Block of the North China Craton at ca. 1.95 Ga. While many resent studies revealed that the khondalite protoliths were sourced from juvenile crustal materials and the time interval between their deposition and subsequent metamorphism is less than 50 million years, the nature and depositional setting of the khondalite protoliths are still controversial. We carried out in this study an integrated analysis of U–Pb age and Hf–O isotopes for detrital zircons from the Helanshan Complex in the westernmost part of the Khondalite Belt. Precise SIMS U–Pb zircon results suggest that the timing of the deposition of the Helanshan khondalite protoliths can be constrained between ca. 2.00 and ca. 1.95 Ga by the minimum age of the detrital zircons from the khondalites and the maximum crystallization age of ca. 1.95 Ga for the intruded granites. The ca. 1.95 Ga granites, the oldest granites identified within the Khondalite Belt, were coeval with the regional high-grade metamorphism.The Helanshan khondalite protoliths were sourced mainly from a provenance with prolonged, episodic magmatism of ca. 2.18 Ga, 2.14 Ga, 2.09 Ga, 2.06 Ga, 2.03 Ga and 2.00 Ga, respectively. Detrital zircons of ca. 2.18–2.00 Ga from the khondalites have ɛHf(t) values ranging from +8.9 to −2.9 and Hf TDMC model ages between 2.8 and 2.1 Ga, with two major peaks at 2.6 Ga and 2.3 Ga. Their δ18O values show two major peaks at 6.6‰ and 8.2‰. Zircon Hf–O isotopic data indicate that both the juvenile and ancient crustal components were involved in their source rocks, and the Helanshan khondalite protoliths were most likely sourced from a ca. 2.18–2.00 Ga continental arc. The juvenile continental arc materials were uplifted, eroded, transported, deposited and metamorphosed within a short time interval of <50 million years. With the predominantly euhedral crystals of the detrital zircons and the immature clastic sediments for the Helanshan khondalite protoliths, we suggest that the khondalite protoliths were likely deposited in an active continental margin, rather than a passive margin as previously thought.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:49:10Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-37229
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:49:10Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Elsevier BV
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-372292017-09-13T15:59:13Z Integrated in situ zircon U–Pb age and Hf–O isotopes for the Helanshan khondalites in North China Craton: Juvenile crustal materials deposited in active or passive continental margin? Dan, W. Li, X. Guo, J. Liu, Y. Wang, Xuan-Ce The Khondalite Belt, one of the three major Paleoproterozoic mobile belts in the North China Craton, consists mainly of khondalite suite and S-type granites. It is thought to be a continental collision belt along which the Yinshan and Ordos Blocks amalgamated to form the Western Block of the North China Craton at ca. 1.95 Ga. While many resent studies revealed that the khondalite protoliths were sourced from juvenile crustal materials and the time interval between their deposition and subsequent metamorphism is less than 50 million years, the nature and depositional setting of the khondalite protoliths are still controversial. We carried out in this study an integrated analysis of U–Pb age and Hf–O isotopes for detrital zircons from the Helanshan Complex in the westernmost part of the Khondalite Belt. Precise SIMS U–Pb zircon results suggest that the timing of the deposition of the Helanshan khondalite protoliths can be constrained between ca. 2.00 and ca. 1.95 Ga by the minimum age of the detrital zircons from the khondalites and the maximum crystallization age of ca. 1.95 Ga for the intruded granites. The ca. 1.95 Ga granites, the oldest granites identified within the Khondalite Belt, were coeval with the regional high-grade metamorphism.The Helanshan khondalite protoliths were sourced mainly from a provenance with prolonged, episodic magmatism of ca. 2.18 Ga, 2.14 Ga, 2.09 Ga, 2.06 Ga, 2.03 Ga and 2.00 Ga, respectively. Detrital zircons of ca. 2.18–2.00 Ga from the khondalites have ɛHf(t) values ranging from +8.9 to −2.9 and Hf TDMC model ages between 2.8 and 2.1 Ga, with two major peaks at 2.6 Ga and 2.3 Ga. Their δ18O values show two major peaks at 6.6‰ and 8.2‰. Zircon Hf–O isotopic data indicate that both the juvenile and ancient crustal components were involved in their source rocks, and the Helanshan khondalite protoliths were most likely sourced from a ca. 2.18–2.00 Ga continental arc. The juvenile continental arc materials were uplifted, eroded, transported, deposited and metamorphosed within a short time interval of <50 million years. With the predominantly euhedral crystals of the detrital zircons and the immature clastic sediments for the Helanshan khondalite protoliths, we suggest that the khondalite protoliths were likely deposited in an active continental margin, rather than a passive margin as previously thought. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37229 10.1016/j.precamres.2011.07.016 Elsevier BV restricted
spellingShingle Dan, W.
Li, X.
Guo, J.
Liu, Y.
Wang, Xuan-Ce
Integrated in situ zircon U–Pb age and Hf–O isotopes for the Helanshan khondalites in North China Craton: Juvenile crustal materials deposited in active or passive continental margin?
title Integrated in situ zircon U–Pb age and Hf–O isotopes for the Helanshan khondalites in North China Craton: Juvenile crustal materials deposited in active or passive continental margin?
title_full Integrated in situ zircon U–Pb age and Hf–O isotopes for the Helanshan khondalites in North China Craton: Juvenile crustal materials deposited in active or passive continental margin?
title_fullStr Integrated in situ zircon U–Pb age and Hf–O isotopes for the Helanshan khondalites in North China Craton: Juvenile crustal materials deposited in active or passive continental margin?
title_full_unstemmed Integrated in situ zircon U–Pb age and Hf–O isotopes for the Helanshan khondalites in North China Craton: Juvenile crustal materials deposited in active or passive continental margin?
title_short Integrated in situ zircon U–Pb age and Hf–O isotopes for the Helanshan khondalites in North China Craton: Juvenile crustal materials deposited in active or passive continental margin?
title_sort integrated in situ zircon u–pb age and hf–o isotopes for the helanshan khondalites in north china craton: juvenile crustal materials deposited in active or passive continental margin?
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37229