Energy Redistribution between the Mean and Pulsating Flow Field in a Separated Flow Region
One of the main features of the backward-facing step (BFS) low frequency pulsatile flow is the unsteadiness due to the convection of vortical (coherent) structures, which characterize the flow dynamics in the shear layer. The physics of the flow field is analyzed by looking at energy redistribution...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
2014
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/36876 |
| _version_ | 1848754892418580480 |
|---|---|
| author | Dol, Sharul Sham Salek, M. Martinuzzi, R. |
| author_facet | Dol, Sharul Sham Salek, M. Martinuzzi, R. |
| author_sort | Dol, Sharul Sham |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | One of the main features of the backward-facing step (BFS) low frequency pulsatile flow is the unsteadiness due to the convection of vortical (coherent) structures, which characterize the flow dynamics in the shear layer. The physics of the flow field is analyzed by looking at energy redistribution between the mean and pulsating flow field obtained via a particle image velocimeter (PIV) using the concept of a triple decomposition. The total fluctuating kinetic budget is calculated and discussed for a mean Reynolds number of 100 and for 0.035 = St = 2.19. The effects that these coherent structures have on the fluctuating kinetic energy production, dissipation, and transport mechanism are examined. The results provide insight into the physics of the flow and suggest reasons for vortex growth and decay. Fluctuating kinetic energy is generally produced at the separated shear layers and transported towards the core flow and then to the upper and lower walls where viscosity dissipates the energy. The remaining energy is transported streamwise and decays as it is convected downstream (St = 0.4 and 1 cases). It was also found that the pressure-velocity correlation diffusion plays a significant role in the transport of kinetic energy and Reynolds stresses, especially in the separated shear layer. More energy was dissipated at the walls for the high Strouhal number case St = 2.19 due to the transverse pressure diffusion term being increasingly dominant. This could be the reason why the convected primary vortices were much smaller in size and weaker with no upper wall vortices formed at this pulsation Strouhal number. The shear production for St = 0.035 was very minimal; thus, the vortices died down quickly even before the shedding could happen. Finally, the pressure-strain correlation term was found to be significant in redistributing the kinetic energy from u-component to v-component. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T08:47:38Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-36876 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T08:47:38Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-368762017-09-13T15:16:38Z Energy Redistribution between the Mean and Pulsating Flow Field in a Separated Flow Region Dol, Sharul Sham Salek, M. Martinuzzi, R. One of the main features of the backward-facing step (BFS) low frequency pulsatile flow is the unsteadiness due to the convection of vortical (coherent) structures, which characterize the flow dynamics in the shear layer. The physics of the flow field is analyzed by looking at energy redistribution between the mean and pulsating flow field obtained via a particle image velocimeter (PIV) using the concept of a triple decomposition. The total fluctuating kinetic budget is calculated and discussed for a mean Reynolds number of 100 and for 0.035 = St = 2.19. The effects that these coherent structures have on the fluctuating kinetic energy production, dissipation, and transport mechanism are examined. The results provide insight into the physics of the flow and suggest reasons for vortex growth and decay. Fluctuating kinetic energy is generally produced at the separated shear layers and transported towards the core flow and then to the upper and lower walls where viscosity dissipates the energy. The remaining energy is transported streamwise and decays as it is convected downstream (St = 0.4 and 1 cases). It was also found that the pressure-velocity correlation diffusion plays a significant role in the transport of kinetic energy and Reynolds stresses, especially in the separated shear layer. More energy was dissipated at the walls for the high Strouhal number case St = 2.19 due to the transverse pressure diffusion term being increasingly dominant. This could be the reason why the convected primary vortices were much smaller in size and weaker with no upper wall vortices formed at this pulsation Strouhal number. The shear production for St = 0.035 was very minimal; thus, the vortices died down quickly even before the shedding could happen. Finally, the pressure-strain correlation term was found to be significant in redistributing the kinetic energy from u-component to v-component. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/36876 10.1115/1.4026923 The American Society of Mechanical Engineers restricted |
| spellingShingle | Dol, Sharul Sham Salek, M. Martinuzzi, R. Energy Redistribution between the Mean and Pulsating Flow Field in a Separated Flow Region |
| title | Energy Redistribution between the Mean and Pulsating Flow Field in a Separated Flow Region |
| title_full | Energy Redistribution between the Mean and Pulsating Flow Field in a Separated Flow Region |
| title_fullStr | Energy Redistribution between the Mean and Pulsating Flow Field in a Separated Flow Region |
| title_full_unstemmed | Energy Redistribution between the Mean and Pulsating Flow Field in a Separated Flow Region |
| title_short | Energy Redistribution between the Mean and Pulsating Flow Field in a Separated Flow Region |
| title_sort | energy redistribution between the mean and pulsating flow field in a separated flow region |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/36876 |