Correct Use of Helmholtz and Gibbs Function Differences, ?A and ?G: The van’t Hoff Reaction Box

Helmholtz and Gibbs function (or energy) differences, Helmholtz and Gibbs function (or energy) differences, ΔA and ΔG, are often invoked by their signs to describe conditions of spontaneity, nonspontaneity, and equilibrium in chemical reactions. While their differences are necessary conditions to es...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Glasser, Leslie
Format: Journal Article
Published: American Chemical Society 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/36800
Description
Summary:Helmholtz and Gibbs function (or energy) differences, Helmholtz and Gibbs function (or energy) differences, ΔA and ΔG, are often invoked by their signs to describe conditions of spontaneity, nonspontaneity, and equilibrium in chemical reactions. While their differences are necessary conditions to establish these behaviors, they are insufficient because they do not apply to local situations where differential values, dA and dG, are appropriate. We here show that the differences are fully meaningful quantities, being important in examining overall reaction, such as in chemical synthesis, where dA and dG may be irrelevant. Interpretation of the differences is readily understood in terms of the van’t Hoff reaction box in which reactants are converted to products, without reference to kinetics or mechanisms, and products are extracted as independent materials, each under their own specified conditions. This behavior can be attained in practical situations where a product can be extracted in a phase separate from the reactants, such as a single gas, an immiscible liquid, a precipitate, a new pure solid phase, or even in an electrochemical or fuel cell. This is illustrated in the case of the Haber–Bosch industrial process for the production of ammonia., are often invoked by their signs to describe conditions of spontaneity, nonspontaneity, and equilibrium in chemical reactions. While their differences are necessary conditions to establish these behaviors, they are insufficient because they do not apply to local situations where differential values, dA and dG, are appropriate. We here show that the differences are fully meaningful quantities, being important in examining overall reaction, such as in chemical synthesis, where dA and dG may be irrelevant. Interpretation of the differences is readily understood in terms of the van’t Hoff reaction box in which reactants are converted to products, without reference to kinetics or mechanisms, and products are extracted as independent materials, each under their own specified conditions. This behavior can be attained in practical situations where a product can be extracted in a phase separate from the reactants, such as a single gas, an immiscible liquid, a precipitate, a new pure solid phase, or even in an electrochemical or fuel cell. This is illustrated in the case of the Haber–Bosch industrial process for the production of ammonia.