Physical activity and risks of proximal and distal colon cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Although there is convincing epidemiological evidence that physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer, it is unclear whether physical activity is differentially associated with the risks of proximal colon and distal colon cancers. We conducted a systematic revie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boyle, T., Keegel, T., Bull, F., Heyworth, J., Fritschi, Lin
Format: Journal Article
Published: Oxford University Press 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/36687
_version_ 1848754839251582976
author Boyle, T.
Keegel, T.
Bull, F.
Heyworth, J.
Fritschi, Lin
author_facet Boyle, T.
Keegel, T.
Bull, F.
Heyworth, J.
Fritschi, Lin
author_sort Boyle, T.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Although there is convincing epidemiological evidence that physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer, it is unclear whether physical activity is differentially associated with the risks of proximal colon and distal colon cancers. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate this issue. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for English-language cohort and case–control studies that examined associations between physical activity and the risks of proximal colon and distal colon cancers. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the summary relative risks (RRs) for the associations between physical activity and the risks of the two cancers. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. The summary relative risk of the main results from these studies indicated that the risk of proximal colon cancer was 27% lower among the most physically active people compared with the least active people (RR = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66 to 0.81). An almost identical result was found for distal colon cancer (RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.80). Conclusion: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of both proximal colon and distal colon cancers, and that the magnitude of the association does not differ by subsite. Given this finding, future research on physical activity and colon cancer should focus on other aspects of the association that remain unclear, such as whether sedentary behavior and nonaerobic physical activity are associated with the risk of colon cancer.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:46:47Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-36687
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:46:47Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-366872019-02-19T05:35:34Z Physical activity and risks of proximal and distal colon cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis Boyle, T. Keegel, T. Bull, F. Heyworth, J. Fritschi, Lin Background: Although there is convincing epidemiological evidence that physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer, it is unclear whether physical activity is differentially associated with the risks of proximal colon and distal colon cancers. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate this issue. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for English-language cohort and case–control studies that examined associations between physical activity and the risks of proximal colon and distal colon cancers. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the summary relative risks (RRs) for the associations between physical activity and the risks of the two cancers. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. The summary relative risk of the main results from these studies indicated that the risk of proximal colon cancer was 27% lower among the most physically active people compared with the least active people (RR = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66 to 0.81). An almost identical result was found for distal colon cancer (RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.80). Conclusion: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of both proximal colon and distal colon cancers, and that the magnitude of the association does not differ by subsite. Given this finding, future research on physical activity and colon cancer should focus on other aspects of the association that remain unclear, such as whether sedentary behavior and nonaerobic physical activity are associated with the risk of colon cancer. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/36687 10.1093/jnci/djs354 Oxford University Press fulltext
spellingShingle Boyle, T.
Keegel, T.
Bull, F.
Heyworth, J.
Fritschi, Lin
Physical activity and risks of proximal and distal colon cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Physical activity and risks of proximal and distal colon cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Physical activity and risks of proximal and distal colon cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Physical activity and risks of proximal and distal colon cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Physical activity and risks of proximal and distal colon cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Physical activity and risks of proximal and distal colon cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort physical activity and risks of proximal and distal colon cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/36687