Acute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admissions to Intensive Care (ARCTIC index): A new measure of quality in cardiac surgery

Background: Quality of cardiac surgical care may vary between institutions. Mortality is low and large numbers are required to discriminate between hospitals. Measures other than mortality may provide better comparisons. Objectives: To develop and assess the Acute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Coulson, T., Bailey, M., Reid, Christopher, Tran, L., Mullany, D., Smith, J., Pilcher, D.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Mosby Inc. 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/36023
_version_ 1848754654355128320
author Coulson, T.
Bailey, M.
Reid, Christopher
Tran, L.
Mullany, D.
Smith, J.
Pilcher, D.
author_facet Coulson, T.
Bailey, M.
Reid, Christopher
Tran, L.
Mullany, D.
Smith, J.
Pilcher, D.
author_sort Coulson, T.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Quality of cardiac surgical care may vary between institutions. Mortality is low and large numbers are required to discriminate between hospitals. Measures other than mortality may provide better comparisons. Objectives: To develop and assess the Acute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admissions to Intensive Care (ARCTIC) index, a new performance measure for cardiothoracic admissions to intensive care units (ICUs). Methods: The Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons database and Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database were linked. Logistic regression was used to generate a predicted risk of death first from preoperative data using the previously validated Allprocscore and second on admission to an ICU using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score. Change in risk as a percentage (ARCTIC) was calculated for each patient. The validity of ARCTIC as a marker of quality was assessed by comparison with intraoperative variables and postoperative morbidity markers. Results: Sixteen thousand six hundred eighty-seven patients at 21 hospitals from 2008 to 2011 were matched. An increase in ARCTIC score was associated with prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (P = .001), intraoperative blood product transfusion (P < .001), reoperation (P < .0001), postoperative renal failure (P < .0001), prolonged ventilation (P < .0001), and stroke (P = .001). Conclusions: The ARCTIC index is associated with known markers of perioperative performance and postoperative morbidity. It may be used as an overall marker of quality for cardiac surgery. Further work is required to assess ARCTIC as a method to discriminate between cardiac surgical units.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:43:51Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-36023
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:43:51Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Mosby Inc.
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-360232017-09-13T15:16:04Z Acute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admissions to Intensive Care (ARCTIC index): A new measure of quality in cardiac surgery Coulson, T. Bailey, M. Reid, Christopher Tran, L. Mullany, D. Smith, J. Pilcher, D. Background: Quality of cardiac surgical care may vary between institutions. Mortality is low and large numbers are required to discriminate between hospitals. Measures other than mortality may provide better comparisons. Objectives: To develop and assess the Acute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admissions to Intensive Care (ARCTIC) index, a new performance measure for cardiothoracic admissions to intensive care units (ICUs). Methods: The Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons database and Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database were linked. Logistic regression was used to generate a predicted risk of death first from preoperative data using the previously validated Allprocscore and second on admission to an ICU using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score. Change in risk as a percentage (ARCTIC) was calculated for each patient. The validity of ARCTIC as a marker of quality was assessed by comparison with intraoperative variables and postoperative morbidity markers. Results: Sixteen thousand six hundred eighty-seven patients at 21 hospitals from 2008 to 2011 were matched. An increase in ARCTIC score was associated with prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (P = .001), intraoperative blood product transfusion (P < .001), reoperation (P < .0001), postoperative renal failure (P < .0001), prolonged ventilation (P < .0001), and stroke (P = .001). Conclusions: The ARCTIC index is associated with known markers of perioperative performance and postoperative morbidity. It may be used as an overall marker of quality for cardiac surgery. Further work is required to assess ARCTIC as a method to discriminate between cardiac surgical units. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/36023 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.069 Mosby Inc. unknown
spellingShingle Coulson, T.
Bailey, M.
Reid, Christopher
Tran, L.
Mullany, D.
Smith, J.
Pilcher, D.
Acute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admissions to Intensive Care (ARCTIC index): A new measure of quality in cardiac surgery
title Acute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admissions to Intensive Care (ARCTIC index): A new measure of quality in cardiac surgery
title_full Acute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admissions to Intensive Care (ARCTIC index): A new measure of quality in cardiac surgery
title_fullStr Acute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admissions to Intensive Care (ARCTIC index): A new measure of quality in cardiac surgery
title_full_unstemmed Acute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admissions to Intensive Care (ARCTIC index): A new measure of quality in cardiac surgery
title_short Acute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admissions to Intensive Care (ARCTIC index): A new measure of quality in cardiac surgery
title_sort acute risk change for cardiothoracic admissions to intensive care (arctic index): a new measure of quality in cardiac surgery
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/36023