A Clinical Investigation of Motivation to Change Standards and Cognitions about Failure in Perfectionism

Background: Clinical perfectionism is a transdiagnostic process that has been found to maintain eating disorders, anxiety disorders and depression. Cognitive behavioural models explaining the maintenance of clinical perfectionism emphasize the contribution of dichotomous thinking and resetting stand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Egan, Sarah, Piek, Jan Patricia, Dyck, M., Rees, Clare, Hagger, Martin
Format: Journal Article
Published: Cambridge University Press 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/35966
_version_ 1848754638988247040
author Egan, Sarah
Piek, Jan Patricia
Dyck, M.
Rees, Clare
Hagger, Martin
author_facet Egan, Sarah
Piek, Jan Patricia
Dyck, M.
Rees, Clare
Hagger, Martin
author_sort Egan, Sarah
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Clinical perfectionism is a transdiagnostic process that has been found to maintain eating disorders, anxiety disorders and depression. Cognitive behavioural models explaining the maintenance of clinical perfectionism emphasize the contribution of dichotomous thinking and resetting standards higher following both success and failure in meeting their goals. There has been a paucity of research examining the predictions of the models and motivation to change perfectionism. Motivation to change is important as individuals with clinical perfectionism often report many perceived benefits of their perfectionism; they are, therefore, likely to be ambivalent regarding changing perfectionism. Aims: The aim was to compare qualitative responses regarding questions about motivation to change standards and cognitions regarding failure to meet a personal standard in two contrasting groups with high and low negative perfectionism. Negative perfectionism refers to concern over not meeting personal standards. Method: A clinical group with a range of axis 1 diagnoses who were elevated on negative perfectionism were compared to a group of athletes who were low on negative perfectionism. Results: Results indicated that the clinical group perceived many negative consequences of their perfectionism. They also, however, reported numerous benefits and the majority stated that they would prefer not to change their perfectionism. The clinical group also reported dichotomous thinking and preferring to either keep standards the same or reset standards higher following failure, whilst the athlete group reported they would keep standards the same or set them lower. Conclusions: The findings support predictions of the cognitive behavioural model of clinical perfectionism.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:43:36Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-35966
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:43:36Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Cambridge University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-359662017-09-13T15:16:38Z A Clinical Investigation of Motivation to Change Standards and Cognitions about Failure in Perfectionism Egan, Sarah Piek, Jan Patricia Dyck, M. Rees, Clare Hagger, Martin Background: Clinical perfectionism is a transdiagnostic process that has been found to maintain eating disorders, anxiety disorders and depression. Cognitive behavioural models explaining the maintenance of clinical perfectionism emphasize the contribution of dichotomous thinking and resetting standards higher following both success and failure in meeting their goals. There has been a paucity of research examining the predictions of the models and motivation to change perfectionism. Motivation to change is important as individuals with clinical perfectionism often report many perceived benefits of their perfectionism; they are, therefore, likely to be ambivalent regarding changing perfectionism. Aims: The aim was to compare qualitative responses regarding questions about motivation to change standards and cognitions regarding failure to meet a personal standard in two contrasting groups with high and low negative perfectionism. Negative perfectionism refers to concern over not meeting personal standards. Method: A clinical group with a range of axis 1 diagnoses who were elevated on negative perfectionism were compared to a group of athletes who were low on negative perfectionism. Results: Results indicated that the clinical group perceived many negative consequences of their perfectionism. They also, however, reported numerous benefits and the majority stated that they would prefer not to change their perfectionism. The clinical group also reported dichotomous thinking and preferring to either keep standards the same or reset standards higher following failure, whilst the athlete group reported they would keep standards the same or set them lower. Conclusions: The findings support predictions of the cognitive behavioural model of clinical perfectionism. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/35966 10.1017/S135246581200063X Cambridge University Press fulltext
spellingShingle Egan, Sarah
Piek, Jan Patricia
Dyck, M.
Rees, Clare
Hagger, Martin
A Clinical Investigation of Motivation to Change Standards and Cognitions about Failure in Perfectionism
title A Clinical Investigation of Motivation to Change Standards and Cognitions about Failure in Perfectionism
title_full A Clinical Investigation of Motivation to Change Standards and Cognitions about Failure in Perfectionism
title_fullStr A Clinical Investigation of Motivation to Change Standards and Cognitions about Failure in Perfectionism
title_full_unstemmed A Clinical Investigation of Motivation to Change Standards and Cognitions about Failure in Perfectionism
title_short A Clinical Investigation of Motivation to Change Standards and Cognitions about Failure in Perfectionism
title_sort clinical investigation of motivation to change standards and cognitions about failure in perfectionism
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/35966