Angelfishes, paper tigers and the devilish taxonomy of the Centropyge flavissima complex.

The pygmy angelfishes (genus Centropyge) provide numerous examples of discordance between color morphology, taxonomy and evolutionary genetic lineages. This discordance is especially evident in the Centropyge flavissima complex, which includes three primary color morphs, three previously recognized...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Di Battista, Joseph, Gaither, M., Hobbs, Jean-Paul, Rocha, L., Bowen, B.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Oxford Journals 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/35190
_version_ 1848754428412166144
author Di Battista, Joseph
Gaither, M.
Hobbs, Jean-Paul
Rocha, L.
Bowen, B.
author_facet Di Battista, Joseph
Gaither, M.
Hobbs, Jean-Paul
Rocha, L.
Bowen, B.
author_sort Di Battista, Joseph
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The pygmy angelfishes (genus Centropyge) provide numerous examples of discordance between color morphology, taxonomy and evolutionary genetic lineages. This discordance is especially evident in the Centropyge flavissima complex, which includes three primary color morphs, three previously recognized species (C. flavissima, C. eibli and C. vrolikii) and three distinct mitochondrial (mtDNA) lineages that do not align with species designations. Our previous research showed that the putative C. flavissima arose independently in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, and the three mtDNA lineages align with geography rather than species assignments. Here we add 157 specimens to the previous dataset of 291 specimens, spread across a greater geographic range, to pinpoint the distribution of mtDNA lineages and color morphs. We found that the mtDNA lineages show remarkably strong geographic boundaries corresponding to the Indian Ocean, Central-West Pacific and Central-South Pacific. We also test the validity of the 'Black Tiger Centropyge' in the C. flavissima species complex, a taxonomic oddity that is restricted to shoals and atolls off the coast of northwestern Australia, and the newly named C. cocosensis (Shen et al. sp. nov. 2016) assigned to the C. flavissima lineage in the Indian Ocean. We conclude that the Black Tiger Centropyge is not a valid species but an intermediate between sympatric color morphs that correspond to the putative species C. eibli and C. vrolikii Our greater sampling effort also do not support the genetic distinctiveness of C. cocosensis given shared mtDNA haplotypes with the sympatric C. eibli and C. vrolikii, but instead we find conflicting lines of evidence concerning the taxonomy of this group. We urge caution and taxonomic restraint until the true nature of this species complex can be revealed.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:40:15Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-35190
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:40:15Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford Journals
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-351902017-09-13T15:32:25Z Angelfishes, paper tigers and the devilish taxonomy of the Centropyge flavissima complex. Di Battista, Joseph Gaither, M. Hobbs, Jean-Paul Rocha, L. Bowen, B. The pygmy angelfishes (genus Centropyge) provide numerous examples of discordance between color morphology, taxonomy and evolutionary genetic lineages. This discordance is especially evident in the Centropyge flavissima complex, which includes three primary color morphs, three previously recognized species (C. flavissima, C. eibli and C. vrolikii) and three distinct mitochondrial (mtDNA) lineages that do not align with species designations. Our previous research showed that the putative C. flavissima arose independently in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, and the three mtDNA lineages align with geography rather than species assignments. Here we add 157 specimens to the previous dataset of 291 specimens, spread across a greater geographic range, to pinpoint the distribution of mtDNA lineages and color morphs. We found that the mtDNA lineages show remarkably strong geographic boundaries corresponding to the Indian Ocean, Central-West Pacific and Central-South Pacific. We also test the validity of the 'Black Tiger Centropyge' in the C. flavissima species complex, a taxonomic oddity that is restricted to shoals and atolls off the coast of northwestern Australia, and the newly named C. cocosensis (Shen et al. sp. nov. 2016) assigned to the C. flavissima lineage in the Indian Ocean. We conclude that the Black Tiger Centropyge is not a valid species but an intermediate between sympatric color morphs that correspond to the putative species C. eibli and C. vrolikii Our greater sampling effort also do not support the genetic distinctiveness of C. cocosensis given shared mtDNA haplotypes with the sympatric C. eibli and C. vrolikii, but instead we find conflicting lines of evidence concerning the taxonomy of this group. We urge caution and taxonomic restraint until the true nature of this species complex can be revealed. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/35190 10.1093/jhered/esw062 Oxford Journals unknown
spellingShingle Di Battista, Joseph
Gaither, M.
Hobbs, Jean-Paul
Rocha, L.
Bowen, B.
Angelfishes, paper tigers and the devilish taxonomy of the Centropyge flavissima complex.
title Angelfishes, paper tigers and the devilish taxonomy of the Centropyge flavissima complex.
title_full Angelfishes, paper tigers and the devilish taxonomy of the Centropyge flavissima complex.
title_fullStr Angelfishes, paper tigers and the devilish taxonomy of the Centropyge flavissima complex.
title_full_unstemmed Angelfishes, paper tigers and the devilish taxonomy of the Centropyge flavissima complex.
title_short Angelfishes, paper tigers and the devilish taxonomy of the Centropyge flavissima complex.
title_sort angelfishes, paper tigers and the devilish taxonomy of the centropyge flavissima complex.
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/35190