Magnetic resonance imaging-derived right ventricular adaptations to endurance versus resistance training

Purpose: Although left ventricular (LV) adaptation to exercise training has been the focus of “athlete’s heart” research to date, information regarding right ventricular (RV) adaptation is sparse because of its complex structure and imaging technique limitations. This is the first prospective, longi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Spence, Angela, Carter, H., Murray, C., Oxborough, D., Naylor, L., George, K., Green, D.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34934
_version_ 1848754358566518784
author Spence, Angela
Carter, H.
Murray, C.
Oxborough, D.
Naylor, L.
George, K.
Green, D.
author_facet Spence, Angela
Carter, H.
Murray, C.
Oxborough, D.
Naylor, L.
George, K.
Green, D.
author_sort Spence, Angela
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Purpose: Although left ventricular (LV) adaptation to exercise training has been the focus of “athlete’s heart” research to date, information regarding right ventricular (RV) adaptation is sparse because of its complex structure and imaging technique limitations. This is the first prospective, longitudinal randomized study exploring the effect of endurance (E) versus resistance (R) exercise training on RV morphology using magnetic resonance imaging. Methods: Twenty-three young untrained men completed a randomly assigned E (n = 10) or R training protocol (n = 13) for 6 months, which was progressive, supervised, and intensive. Repeated measures included body composition, aerobic fitness, muscular strength, RV morphology (magnetic resonance imaging) and function (speckle tracking echocardiography). Results: Total lean mass increased in both groups (E = +1.3 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3–2.3; R = +2.1 kg, 95% CI = 1.5–3.2), whereas aerobic fitness significantly improved in E (+3.7 mL•kg−1•min−1, 95% CI = 0.9–6.5) but not in R training. Strength improved in both groups, but to a greater extent in R-trained subjects (+53.8 kg, 95% CI = 46.7–60.9 vs +35.3 kg, 95% CI = 27.3–43.4). After training, RV mass increased by 2.7 g (95% CI = −0.4 to 5.8) after E and by 1.4 g (95% CI = −1.3 to 4.1) after R training. The RV end-diastolic volume increased after E (+13.8 mL, 95% CI = 1.9–25.7), with a smaller change after R exercise (+3.9 mL, 95% CI = −6.5 to 14.3). The LV-to-RV mass ratio and myocardial function did not change in either group. Conclusion: Mild morphological RV adaptation occurred after 6 months of intense supervised E and R exercise training. The degree of change was slightly but not significantly larger after E training. RV changes mirrored those observed in the left ventricle.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:39:09Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-34934
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:39:09Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-349342017-09-13T15:28:01Z Magnetic resonance imaging-derived right ventricular adaptations to endurance versus resistance training Spence, Angela Carter, H. Murray, C. Oxborough, D. Naylor, L. George, K. Green, D. Purpose: Although left ventricular (LV) adaptation to exercise training has been the focus of “athlete’s heart” research to date, information regarding right ventricular (RV) adaptation is sparse because of its complex structure and imaging technique limitations. This is the first prospective, longitudinal randomized study exploring the effect of endurance (E) versus resistance (R) exercise training on RV morphology using magnetic resonance imaging. Methods: Twenty-three young untrained men completed a randomly assigned E (n = 10) or R training protocol (n = 13) for 6 months, which was progressive, supervised, and intensive. Repeated measures included body composition, aerobic fitness, muscular strength, RV morphology (magnetic resonance imaging) and function (speckle tracking echocardiography). Results: Total lean mass increased in both groups (E = +1.3 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3–2.3; R = +2.1 kg, 95% CI = 1.5–3.2), whereas aerobic fitness significantly improved in E (+3.7 mL•kg−1•min−1, 95% CI = 0.9–6.5) but not in R training. Strength improved in both groups, but to a greater extent in R-trained subjects (+53.8 kg, 95% CI = 46.7–60.9 vs +35.3 kg, 95% CI = 27.3–43.4). After training, RV mass increased by 2.7 g (95% CI = −0.4 to 5.8) after E and by 1.4 g (95% CI = −1.3 to 4.1) after R training. The RV end-diastolic volume increased after E (+13.8 mL, 95% CI = 1.9–25.7), with a smaller change after R exercise (+3.9 mL, 95% CI = −6.5 to 14.3). The LV-to-RV mass ratio and myocardial function did not change in either group. Conclusion: Mild morphological RV adaptation occurred after 6 months of intense supervised E and R exercise training. The degree of change was slightly but not significantly larger after E training. RV changes mirrored those observed in the left ventricle. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34934 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182780b0e Lippincott Williams & Wilkins unknown
spellingShingle Spence, Angela
Carter, H.
Murray, C.
Oxborough, D.
Naylor, L.
George, K.
Green, D.
Magnetic resonance imaging-derived right ventricular adaptations to endurance versus resistance training
title Magnetic resonance imaging-derived right ventricular adaptations to endurance versus resistance training
title_full Magnetic resonance imaging-derived right ventricular adaptations to endurance versus resistance training
title_fullStr Magnetic resonance imaging-derived right ventricular adaptations to endurance versus resistance training
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic resonance imaging-derived right ventricular adaptations to endurance versus resistance training
title_short Magnetic resonance imaging-derived right ventricular adaptations to endurance versus resistance training
title_sort magnetic resonance imaging-derived right ventricular adaptations to endurance versus resistance training
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34934