Leadership, commitment, and culture: A meta-analysis

The two purposes of this article were to examine the meta-analytic relationships between several well-studied forms of leadership and employee commitment and to test if some of these relationships vary due to societal culture. Transformational/charismatic leadership was shown to be positively relate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jackson, T., Meyer, John, Wang, X.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34668
_version_ 1848754285624426496
author Jackson, T.
Meyer, John
Wang, X.
author_facet Jackson, T.
Meyer, John
Wang, X.
author_sort Jackson, T.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The two purposes of this article were to examine the meta-analytic relationships between several well-studied forms of leadership and employee commitment and to test if some of these relationships vary due to societal culture. Transformational/charismatic leadership was shown to be positively related to affective (AC; ρ = .451, k = 116) and normative commitment (NC; ρ = .337, k = 30), while contingent reward and management-by-exception (active) were positively related to AC (ρ = .369, k = 51 and ρ = .083, k = 25, respectively). Laissez faire leadership was negatively related to AC (ρ = −.296, k = 15). In terms of culture, societal individualism-collectivism did not affect the relationship between transformational/charismatic leadership and AC. In contrast, the relationship between transformational/charismatic leadership and both NC and continuance commitment was stronger in countries that value collectivism. We also found evidence that the relationship between contingent reward and AC was stronger in societies with higher rather than lower levels of power distance/hierarchy. Implications of these findings on the study of leadership, culture, and commitment are discussed.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:37:59Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-34668
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:37:59Z
publishDate 2013
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-346682017-09-13T15:23:54Z Leadership, commitment, and culture: A meta-analysis Jackson, T. Meyer, John Wang, X. The two purposes of this article were to examine the meta-analytic relationships between several well-studied forms of leadership and employee commitment and to test if some of these relationships vary due to societal culture. Transformational/charismatic leadership was shown to be positively related to affective (AC; ρ = .451, k = 116) and normative commitment (NC; ρ = .337, k = 30), while contingent reward and management-by-exception (active) were positively related to AC (ρ = .369, k = 51 and ρ = .083, k = 25, respectively). Laissez faire leadership was negatively related to AC (ρ = −.296, k = 15). In terms of culture, societal individualism-collectivism did not affect the relationship between transformational/charismatic leadership and AC. In contrast, the relationship between transformational/charismatic leadership and both NC and continuance commitment was stronger in countries that value collectivism. We also found evidence that the relationship between contingent reward and AC was stronger in societies with higher rather than lower levels of power distance/hierarchy. Implications of these findings on the study of leadership, culture, and commitment are discussed. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34668 10.1177/1548051812466919 restricted
spellingShingle Jackson, T.
Meyer, John
Wang, X.
Leadership, commitment, and culture: A meta-analysis
title Leadership, commitment, and culture: A meta-analysis
title_full Leadership, commitment, and culture: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Leadership, commitment, and culture: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Leadership, commitment, and culture: A meta-analysis
title_short Leadership, commitment, and culture: A meta-analysis
title_sort leadership, commitment, and culture: a meta-analysis
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34668