Linking field and farmer surveys to determine the most important changes to weed incidence

An understanding of weed species incidence and patterns of change in incidence is vital in developing weed management strategies and directing future research endeavours. Weed incidence in fields in the south-west of Western Australia was surveyed in 1997 and repeated in 2008 to determine any change...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Borger, C., Michael, Pippa, Mandel, R., Hashem, A., Bowran, D., Renton, M.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Blackwell Scientific Publications 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34464
_version_ 1848754230033121280
author Borger, C.
Michael, Pippa
Mandel, R.
Hashem, A.
Bowran, D.
Renton, M.
author_facet Borger, C.
Michael, Pippa
Mandel, R.
Hashem, A.
Bowran, D.
Renton, M.
author_sort Borger, C.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description An understanding of weed species incidence and patterns of change in incidence is vital in developing weed management strategies and directing future research endeavours. Weed incidence in fields in the south-west of Western Australia was surveyed in 1997 and repeated in 2008 to determine any changes. In 2008, farmers were also surveyed to determine their perception of changes to weed incidence and severity. The field survey identified a total of 194 weed species (or groups of a genus) in the combined survey data set (i.e. 956 sites from both field surveys). The majority of survey sites were utilised for cropping, and 152 weed species were identified within cropped fields. Between 1997 and 2008, noticeable decreases in incidence (in cropped fields) were observed for Vulpia spp. (-25%), Aira caryophyllea (-21%), Bromus diandrus (-20%), Avena fatua (-18%) and Austrostipa spp. (-13%), with only Raphanus raphanistrum (11%) and Arctotheca calendula (7%) significantly increasing in frequency. Farmer perception of the most severe weed problems did not always coincide with survey results of weed incidence. For example, an exceptionally common weed like A. calendula (with increasing incidence) was of less concern to farmers than the extremely rare Conyza spp. The main conclusion of this research is that the prevalence of a weed species is not always an indication of whether the species is of economic concern to industry. Therefore, it is vital to link field survey results to industry perception of weed species severity, when directing future research efforts into weed management.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:37:06Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-34464
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:37:06Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Scientific Publications
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-344642017-09-13T16:09:10Z Linking field and farmer surveys to determine the most important changes to weed incidence Borger, C. Michael, Pippa Mandel, R. Hashem, A. Bowran, D. Renton, M. rare weed species Conyza species Hordeum species weed incidence Raphanus raphanistrum farm enterprise An understanding of weed species incidence and patterns of change in incidence is vital in developing weed management strategies and directing future research endeavours. Weed incidence in fields in the south-west of Western Australia was surveyed in 1997 and repeated in 2008 to determine any changes. In 2008, farmers were also surveyed to determine their perception of changes to weed incidence and severity. The field survey identified a total of 194 weed species (or groups of a genus) in the combined survey data set (i.e. 956 sites from both field surveys). The majority of survey sites were utilised for cropping, and 152 weed species were identified within cropped fields. Between 1997 and 2008, noticeable decreases in incidence (in cropped fields) were observed for Vulpia spp. (-25%), Aira caryophyllea (-21%), Bromus diandrus (-20%), Avena fatua (-18%) and Austrostipa spp. (-13%), with only Raphanus raphanistrum (11%) and Arctotheca calendula (7%) significantly increasing in frequency. Farmer perception of the most severe weed problems did not always coincide with survey results of weed incidence. For example, an exceptionally common weed like A. calendula (with increasing incidence) was of less concern to farmers than the extremely rare Conyza spp. The main conclusion of this research is that the prevalence of a weed species is not always an indication of whether the species is of economic concern to industry. Therefore, it is vital to link field survey results to industry perception of weed species severity, when directing future research efforts into weed management. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34464 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2012.00950.x Blackwell Scientific Publications restricted
spellingShingle rare weed species
Conyza species
Hordeum species
weed incidence
Raphanus raphanistrum
farm enterprise
Borger, C.
Michael, Pippa
Mandel, R.
Hashem, A.
Bowran, D.
Renton, M.
Linking field and farmer surveys to determine the most important changes to weed incidence
title Linking field and farmer surveys to determine the most important changes to weed incidence
title_full Linking field and farmer surveys to determine the most important changes to weed incidence
title_fullStr Linking field and farmer surveys to determine the most important changes to weed incidence
title_full_unstemmed Linking field and farmer surveys to determine the most important changes to weed incidence
title_short Linking field and farmer surveys to determine the most important changes to weed incidence
title_sort linking field and farmer surveys to determine the most important changes to weed incidence
topic rare weed species
Conyza species
Hordeum species
weed incidence
Raphanus raphanistrum
farm enterprise
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34464