Hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite, sub-elite and amateur Australian footballers

© 2015 Sports Medicine Australia. Objectives: It has been reported that obtaining an adduction-to-abduction strength ratio of 90-100%, and an adduction strength equal to that of the uninjured side, are suitable clinical milestones for return to sport following groin injury. Little is known about hip...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prendergast, N., Hopper, D., Finucane, M., Grisbrook, Tiffany
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34275
_version_ 1848754178079326208
author Prendergast, N.
Hopper, D.
Finucane, M.
Grisbrook, Tiffany
author_facet Prendergast, N.
Hopper, D.
Finucane, M.
Grisbrook, Tiffany
author_sort Prendergast, N.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2015 Sports Medicine Australia. Objectives: It has been reported that obtaining an adduction-to-abduction strength ratio of 90-100%, and an adduction strength equal to that of the uninjured side, are suitable clinical milestones for return to sport following groin injury. Little is known about hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in Australian footballers. This study aimed to compare isometric hip adduction and abduction strength profiles between preferred and non-preferred kicking legs in elite, sub-elite and amateur Australian footballers. Design: Cross sectional study. Methods: 36 elite, 19 sub-elite and 18 amateur Australian footballers, with a mean age of 24, 19 and 23 years respectively, were included. Maximal hip isometric adduction and abduction strength were measured using a hand held dynamometer with external belt fixation. Results: There were no significant differences in isometric hip adduction (p = 0.262) or abduction (p = 0.934) strength, or the adduction-to-abduction ratio (p = 0.163), between preferred and non-preferred kicking legs, regardless of playing level. Elite players had significantly greater isometric hip adduction and abduction strength than both sub-elite (mean difference; adduction = 46.01. N, p <. 0.001, abduction = 30.79. N, p = 0.003) and amateur players (mean difference; adduction = 78.72. N, p <. 0.001, abduction = 59.11. N, p <. 0.001). There was no significant difference in the adduction-to-abduction ratio between the playing levels (p = 0.165). Conclusions: No significant differences were found between preferred and non-preferred kicking legs across the playing levels for isometric hip adduction, abduction or the adduction-to-abduction ratio. This may have implications for developing groin injury prediction and return to sport criteria in Australian footballers.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:36:16Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-34275
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:36:16Z
publishDate 2015
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-342752017-09-13T15:10:44Z Hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite, sub-elite and amateur Australian footballers Prendergast, N. Hopper, D. Finucane, M. Grisbrook, Tiffany © 2015 Sports Medicine Australia. Objectives: It has been reported that obtaining an adduction-to-abduction strength ratio of 90-100%, and an adduction strength equal to that of the uninjured side, are suitable clinical milestones for return to sport following groin injury. Little is known about hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in Australian footballers. This study aimed to compare isometric hip adduction and abduction strength profiles between preferred and non-preferred kicking legs in elite, sub-elite and amateur Australian footballers. Design: Cross sectional study. Methods: 36 elite, 19 sub-elite and 18 amateur Australian footballers, with a mean age of 24, 19 and 23 years respectively, were included. Maximal hip isometric adduction and abduction strength were measured using a hand held dynamometer with external belt fixation. Results: There were no significant differences in isometric hip adduction (p = 0.262) or abduction (p = 0.934) strength, or the adduction-to-abduction ratio (p = 0.163), between preferred and non-preferred kicking legs, regardless of playing level. Elite players had significantly greater isometric hip adduction and abduction strength than both sub-elite (mean difference; adduction = 46.01. N, p <. 0.001, abduction = 30.79. N, p = 0.003) and amateur players (mean difference; adduction = 78.72. N, p <. 0.001, abduction = 59.11. N, p <. 0.001). There was no significant difference in the adduction-to-abduction ratio between the playing levels (p = 0.165). Conclusions: No significant differences were found between preferred and non-preferred kicking legs across the playing levels for isometric hip adduction, abduction or the adduction-to-abduction ratio. This may have implications for developing groin injury prediction and return to sport criteria in Australian footballers. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34275 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.12.005 restricted
spellingShingle Prendergast, N.
Hopper, D.
Finucane, M.
Grisbrook, Tiffany
Hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite, sub-elite and amateur Australian footballers
title Hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite, sub-elite and amateur Australian footballers
title_full Hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite, sub-elite and amateur Australian footballers
title_fullStr Hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite, sub-elite and amateur Australian footballers
title_full_unstemmed Hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite, sub-elite and amateur Australian footballers
title_short Hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite, sub-elite and amateur Australian footballers
title_sort hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite, sub-elite and amateur australian footballers
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34275