Constitutional, philosophical and historical perspectives of the capital punishment debate in Australia and the United States

Capital punishment has been abolished in all Australian States. However, public demands for the reintroduction of the death penalty continue to be heard intermittently in Australia, especially after a gruesome murder or other atrocity. A discussion of the appropriateness and desirability (as opposed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moens, Gabriel, Thompson, A.
Format: Journal Article
Published: George Bacovia University 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34193
_version_ 1848754156076007424
author Moens, Gabriel
Thompson, A.
author_facet Moens, Gabriel
Thompson, A.
author_sort Moens, Gabriel
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Capital punishment has been abolished in all Australian States. However, public demands for the reintroduction of the death penalty continue to be heard intermittently in Australia, especially after a gruesome murder or other atrocity. A discussion of the appropriateness and desirability (as opposed to the legality or illegality) of the death penalty is never completely removed from the Australian and American political agenda. An objective observer cannot fail to notice that, in general, such discussion is often carried on by people who have preconceived and inflexible views. An inevitable result is the polarisation of the capital punishment debate. In these circumstances, an insistence on cogent reasoning is clearly warranted.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:35:55Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-34193
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:35:55Z
publishDate 2012
publisher George Bacovia University
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-341932017-01-30T13:41:49Z Constitutional, philosophical and historical perspectives of the capital punishment debate in Australia and the United States Moens, Gabriel Thompson, A. Capital punishment has been abolished in all Australian States. However, public demands for the reintroduction of the death penalty continue to be heard intermittently in Australia, especially after a gruesome murder or other atrocity. A discussion of the appropriateness and desirability (as opposed to the legality or illegality) of the death penalty is never completely removed from the Australian and American political agenda. An objective observer cannot fail to notice that, in general, such discussion is often carried on by people who have preconceived and inflexible views. An inevitable result is the polarisation of the capital punishment debate. In these circumstances, an insistence on cogent reasoning is clearly warranted. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34193 George Bacovia University restricted
spellingShingle Moens, Gabriel
Thompson, A.
Constitutional, philosophical and historical perspectives of the capital punishment debate in Australia and the United States
title Constitutional, philosophical and historical perspectives of the capital punishment debate in Australia and the United States
title_full Constitutional, philosophical and historical perspectives of the capital punishment debate in Australia and the United States
title_fullStr Constitutional, philosophical and historical perspectives of the capital punishment debate in Australia and the United States
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional, philosophical and historical perspectives of the capital punishment debate in Australia and the United States
title_short Constitutional, philosophical and historical perspectives of the capital punishment debate in Australia and the United States
title_sort constitutional, philosophical and historical perspectives of the capital punishment debate in australia and the united states
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34193