Use of emergency departments by older people from residential care: A population based study

Objective: to investigate the differences between emergency department (ED) presentations of older people who do and do not live in residential care facilities (RCFs). Design: a population-based retrospective cohort study. ED records linked to ambulance and hospital morbidity records. Setting: publi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ingarfield, S., Finn, Judith, Jacobs, Ian, Gibson, N., Holman, C., Jelinek, G., Flicker, L.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Oxford University Press 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/33659
_version_ 1848754008786731008
author Ingarfield, S.
Finn, Judith
Jacobs, Ian
Gibson, N.
Holman, C.
Jelinek, G.
Flicker, L.
author_facet Ingarfield, S.
Finn, Judith
Jacobs, Ian
Gibson, N.
Holman, C.
Jelinek, G.
Flicker, L.
author_sort Ingarfield, S.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Objective: to investigate the differences between emergency department (ED) presentations of older people who do and do not live in residential care facilities (RCFs). Design: a population-based retrospective cohort study. ED records linked to ambulance and hospital morbidity records. Setting: public EDs in Perth, Western Australia. Subjects: all patients 65 years and older who presented to EDs between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006 (n = 97,161). Measurements: patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Logistic regression was used to model the effect of living in RCFs on the likelihood of a particular ED diagnosis, hospital admission and in-hospital death. Results: the age-sex standardised rate of ED presentation for those living in RCFs was 1.69 times that of community dwellers. Compared to community dwellers, people from RCFs were older (mean age 84.7 years vs. 76.0 years, P < 0.001) and a lower proportion were male (28.7% vs. 46.7%, P < 0.001). Adjusting for age and sex revealed that people from RCFs were more likely to be diagnosed with pneumonia/influenza) odds ratio (OR) 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.72-2.19), urinary tract infections (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.49%1.98) or hip fractures (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.32); less likely to be diagnosed with circulatory system diseases (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.64-0.75) or neoplasms (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.72); more likely to be admitted (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06-1.20) and to die in hospital (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.40-1.75). Conclusion: there are different patterns of ED presentations and hospital admissions of older people who do and do not live in RCFs. The appropriateness of these differences is uncertain.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:33:35Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-33659
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:33:35Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-336592017-09-13T15:32:25Z Use of emergency departments by older people from residential care: A population based study Ingarfield, S. Finn, Judith Jacobs, Ian Gibson, N. Holman, C. Jelinek, G. Flicker, L. emergency medicine elderly residential facilities aged Objective: to investigate the differences between emergency department (ED) presentations of older people who do and do not live in residential care facilities (RCFs). Design: a population-based retrospective cohort study. ED records linked to ambulance and hospital morbidity records. Setting: public EDs in Perth, Western Australia. Subjects: all patients 65 years and older who presented to EDs between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006 (n = 97,161). Measurements: patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Logistic regression was used to model the effect of living in RCFs on the likelihood of a particular ED diagnosis, hospital admission and in-hospital death. Results: the age-sex standardised rate of ED presentation for those living in RCFs was 1.69 times that of community dwellers. Compared to community dwellers, people from RCFs were older (mean age 84.7 years vs. 76.0 years, P < 0.001) and a lower proportion were male (28.7% vs. 46.7%, P < 0.001). Adjusting for age and sex revealed that people from RCFs were more likely to be diagnosed with pneumonia/influenza) odds ratio (OR) 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.72-2.19), urinary tract infections (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.49%1.98) or hip fractures (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.32); less likely to be diagnosed with circulatory system diseases (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.64-0.75) or neoplasms (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.72); more likely to be admitted (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06-1.20) and to die in hospital (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.40-1.75). Conclusion: there are different patterns of ED presentations and hospital admissions of older people who do and do not live in RCFs. The appropriateness of these differences is uncertain. 2009 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/33659 10.1093/ageing/afp022 Oxford University Press unknown
spellingShingle emergency medicine
elderly
residential facilities
aged
Ingarfield, S.
Finn, Judith
Jacobs, Ian
Gibson, N.
Holman, C.
Jelinek, G.
Flicker, L.
Use of emergency departments by older people from residential care: A population based study
title Use of emergency departments by older people from residential care: A population based study
title_full Use of emergency departments by older people from residential care: A population based study
title_fullStr Use of emergency departments by older people from residential care: A population based study
title_full_unstemmed Use of emergency departments by older people from residential care: A population based study
title_short Use of emergency departments by older people from residential care: A population based study
title_sort use of emergency departments by older people from residential care: a population based study
topic emergency medicine
elderly
residential facilities
aged
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/33659