Referring patients to specialists: a structured vignette survey of Australian and British GPs

BACKGROUND: In Australia and in the United Kingdom (UK) access to specialists is sanctioned by General Practitioners (GPs). It is important to understand how practitioners determine which patients warrant referral. METHODS: A self-administered structured vignette postal survey of General Practitione...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiwa, Moyez, Gordon, M., Arnet, Hayley, Ee, H., Bulsara, Max, Colwell, B.
Format: Journal Article
Published: BioMed Central 2008
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/33393
_version_ 1848753934106099712
author Jiwa, Moyez
Gordon, M.
Arnet, Hayley
Ee, H.
Bulsara, Max
Colwell, B.
author_facet Jiwa, Moyez
Gordon, M.
Arnet, Hayley
Ee, H.
Bulsara, Max
Colwell, B.
author_sort Jiwa, Moyez
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description BACKGROUND: In Australia and in the United Kingdom (UK) access to specialists is sanctioned by General Practitioners (GPs). It is important to understand how practitioners determine which patients warrant referral. METHODS: A self-administered structured vignette postal survey of General Practitioners in Western Australia and the United Kingdom. Sixty-four vignettes describing patients with colorectal symptoms were constructed encompassing six clinical details. Nine vignettes, chosen at random, were presented to each individual. Respondents were asked if they would refer the patient to a specialist and how urgently. Logistic regression and parametric tests were used to analyse the data RESULTS: We received 260 completed questionnaires. 58% of 'cancer vignettes' were selected for 'urgent' referral. 1632/2367 or 69% of all vignettes were selected for referral. After adjusting for clustering the model suggests that 38.4% of the variability is explained by all the clinical variables as well as the age and experience of the respondents.1012 or 42.8 % of vignettes were referred 'urgently'. After adjusting for clustering the data suggests that 31.3 % of the variability is explained by the model. The age of the respondents, the location of the practice and all the clinical variables were significant in the decision to refer urgently. CONCLUSION: GPs' referral decisions for patients with lower bowel symptoms are similar in the two countries. We question the wisdom of streaming referrals from primary care without a strong evidence base and an effective intervention for implementing guidelines. We conclude that implementation must take into account the profile of patients but also the characteristics of GPs and referral policies.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:32:24Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-33393
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:32:24Z
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-333932017-01-30T13:36:52Z Referring patients to specialists: a structured vignette survey of Australian and British GPs Jiwa, Moyez Gordon, M. Arnet, Hayley Ee, H. Bulsara, Max Colwell, B. BACKGROUND: In Australia and in the United Kingdom (UK) access to specialists is sanctioned by General Practitioners (GPs). It is important to understand how practitioners determine which patients warrant referral. METHODS: A self-administered structured vignette postal survey of General Practitioners in Western Australia and the United Kingdom. Sixty-four vignettes describing patients with colorectal symptoms were constructed encompassing six clinical details. Nine vignettes, chosen at random, were presented to each individual. Respondents were asked if they would refer the patient to a specialist and how urgently. Logistic regression and parametric tests were used to analyse the data RESULTS: We received 260 completed questionnaires. 58% of 'cancer vignettes' were selected for 'urgent' referral. 1632/2367 or 69% of all vignettes were selected for referral. After adjusting for clustering the model suggests that 38.4% of the variability is explained by all the clinical variables as well as the age and experience of the respondents.1012 or 42.8 % of vignettes were referred 'urgently'. After adjusting for clustering the data suggests that 31.3 % of the variability is explained by the model. The age of the respondents, the location of the practice and all the clinical variables were significant in the decision to refer urgently. CONCLUSION: GPs' referral decisions for patients with lower bowel symptoms are similar in the two countries. We question the wisdom of streaming referrals from primary care without a strong evidence base and an effective intervention for implementing guidelines. We conclude that implementation must take into account the profile of patients but also the characteristics of GPs and referral policies. 2008 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/33393 BioMed Central fulltext
spellingShingle Jiwa, Moyez
Gordon, M.
Arnet, Hayley
Ee, H.
Bulsara, Max
Colwell, B.
Referring patients to specialists: a structured vignette survey of Australian and British GPs
title Referring patients to specialists: a structured vignette survey of Australian and British GPs
title_full Referring patients to specialists: a structured vignette survey of Australian and British GPs
title_fullStr Referring patients to specialists: a structured vignette survey of Australian and British GPs
title_full_unstemmed Referring patients to specialists: a structured vignette survey of Australian and British GPs
title_short Referring patients to specialists: a structured vignette survey of Australian and British GPs
title_sort referring patients to specialists: a structured vignette survey of australian and british gps
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/33393