Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis

Objective: To determine which simple index of overweight and obesity is the best discriminator of cardiovascular risk factors. Study Design and Setting: This is a meta-analysis of published literature. MEDLINE was searched. Studies that used receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee, Crystal, Huxley, Rachel, Wildman, R., Woodward, M.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier 2008
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/33307
_version_ 1848753909381726208
author Lee, Crystal
Huxley, Rachel
Wildman, R.
Woodward, M.
author_facet Lee, Crystal
Huxley, Rachel
Wildman, R.
Woodward, M.
author_sort Lee, Crystal
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Objective: To determine which simple index of overweight and obesity is the best discriminator of cardiovascular risk factors. Study Design and Setting: This is a meta-analysis of published literature. MEDLINE was searched. Studies that used receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and published area under the ROC curves (AUC) for overweight and obesity indices with hypertension, type-2 diabetes, and/or dyslipidemia were included. The AUC for each of the four indices, with each risk factor, was pooled using a random-effects model; male and female data were analyzed separately. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Body mass index (BMI) was the poorest discriminator for cardiovascular risk factors. Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) was the best discriminator for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia in both sexes; its pooled AUC (95% confidence intervals) ranged from 0.67 (0.64, 0.69) to 0.73 (0.70, 0.75) and from 0.68 (0.63, 0.72) to 0.76 (0.70, 0.81) in males and females, respectively. Conclusion: Statistical evidence supports the superiority of measures of centralized obesity, especially WHtR, over BMI, for detecting cardiovascular risk factors in both men and women. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:32:00Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-33307
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:32:00Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-333072017-09-13T15:31:39Z Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis Lee, Crystal Huxley, Rachel Wildman, R. Woodward, M. Objective: To determine which simple index of overweight and obesity is the best discriminator of cardiovascular risk factors. Study Design and Setting: This is a meta-analysis of published literature. MEDLINE was searched. Studies that used receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and published area under the ROC curves (AUC) for overweight and obesity indices with hypertension, type-2 diabetes, and/or dyslipidemia were included. The AUC for each of the four indices, with each risk factor, was pooled using a random-effects model; male and female data were analyzed separately. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Body mass index (BMI) was the poorest discriminator for cardiovascular risk factors. Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) was the best discriminator for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia in both sexes; its pooled AUC (95% confidence intervals) ranged from 0.67 (0.64, 0.69) to 0.73 (0.70, 0.75) and from 0.68 (0.63, 0.72) to 0.76 (0.70, 0.81) in males and females, respectively. Conclusion: Statistical evidence supports the superiority of measures of centralized obesity, especially WHtR, over BMI, for detecting cardiovascular risk factors in both men and women. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2008 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/33307 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.08.012 Elsevier restricted
spellingShingle Lee, Crystal
Huxley, Rachel
Wildman, R.
Woodward, M.
Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis
title Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis
title_full Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis
title_short Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis
title_sort indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than bmi: a meta-analysis
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/33307