Low Vancomycin MICs and Fecal Densities Reduce the Sensitivity of Screening Methods for Vancomycin Resistance in Enterococci

Active surveillance is part of a multifaceted approach used to prevent the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). The impact of fecal density, the vancomycin MIC of the isolate, and the vancomycin concentration in liquid medium on test performance are uncertain. Using fecal specimens spik...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wijesuriya, T., Perry, P., Pryce, T., Boehm, J., Kay, I., Flexman, J., Coombs, Geoffrey, Ingram, P.
Format: Journal Article
Published: American Society for Microbiology 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/32427
_version_ 1848753660866068480
author Wijesuriya, T.
Perry, P.
Pryce, T.
Boehm, J.
Kay, I.
Flexman, J.
Coombs, Geoffrey
Ingram, P.
author_facet Wijesuriya, T.
Perry, P.
Pryce, T.
Boehm, J.
Kay, I.
Flexman, J.
Coombs, Geoffrey
Ingram, P.
author_sort Wijesuriya, T.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Active surveillance is part of a multifaceted approach used to prevent the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). The impact of fecal density, the vancomycin MIC of the isolate, and the vancomycin concentration in liquid medium on test performance are uncertain. Using fecal specimens spiked with a collection of 18 VRE (predominantly vanB) with a wide vancomycin MIC range, we compared the performances of commercial chromogenic agars (CHROMagar VRE, chromID VRE, Brilliance VRE, and VRE Select) and 1 liquid medium (Enterococcosel enrichment broth) for VRE detection. The specificity of solid media was excellent; however, the sensitivity at 48 h varied from 78 to 94%. Screening using liquid medium was less sensitive than screening with solid media, particularly as the vancomycin content increased. Sensitivity declined (i) as the fecal VRE density decreased, (ii) when the media were assessed at 24 h (versus 48 h), and (iii) for isolates with a low vancomycin MIC (sensitivity, 25 to 75% versus 100% for isolates with vancomycin MIC of <16 mg/liter versus >32 mg/liter on solid medium using 10 6 CFU/ml of feces). Depending on local epidemiology and in particular VRE vancomycin MICs, the sensitivity of culture-based methods for VRE screening of stool or rectal specimens may be suboptimal, potentially facilitating secondary transmission.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:28:03Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-32427
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:28:03Z
publishDate 2014
publisher American Society for Microbiology
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-324272018-03-29T09:08:12Z Low Vancomycin MICs and Fecal Densities Reduce the Sensitivity of Screening Methods for Vancomycin Resistance in Enterococci Wijesuriya, T. Perry, P. Pryce, T. Boehm, J. Kay, I. Flexman, J. Coombs, Geoffrey Ingram, P. Active surveillance is part of a multifaceted approach used to prevent the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). The impact of fecal density, the vancomycin MIC of the isolate, and the vancomycin concentration in liquid medium on test performance are uncertain. Using fecal specimens spiked with a collection of 18 VRE (predominantly vanB) with a wide vancomycin MIC range, we compared the performances of commercial chromogenic agars (CHROMagar VRE, chromID VRE, Brilliance VRE, and VRE Select) and 1 liquid medium (Enterococcosel enrichment broth) for VRE detection. The specificity of solid media was excellent; however, the sensitivity at 48 h varied from 78 to 94%. Screening using liquid medium was less sensitive than screening with solid media, particularly as the vancomycin content increased. Sensitivity declined (i) as the fecal VRE density decreased, (ii) when the media were assessed at 24 h (versus 48 h), and (iii) for isolates with a low vancomycin MIC (sensitivity, 25 to 75% versus 100% for isolates with vancomycin MIC of <16 mg/liter versus >32 mg/liter on solid medium using 10 6 CFU/ml of feces). Depending on local epidemiology and in particular VRE vancomycin MICs, the sensitivity of culture-based methods for VRE screening of stool or rectal specimens may be suboptimal, potentially facilitating secondary transmission. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/32427 10.1128/JCM.00021-14 American Society for Microbiology restricted
spellingShingle Wijesuriya, T.
Perry, P.
Pryce, T.
Boehm, J.
Kay, I.
Flexman, J.
Coombs, Geoffrey
Ingram, P.
Low Vancomycin MICs and Fecal Densities Reduce the Sensitivity of Screening Methods for Vancomycin Resistance in Enterococci
title Low Vancomycin MICs and Fecal Densities Reduce the Sensitivity of Screening Methods for Vancomycin Resistance in Enterococci
title_full Low Vancomycin MICs and Fecal Densities Reduce the Sensitivity of Screening Methods for Vancomycin Resistance in Enterococci
title_fullStr Low Vancomycin MICs and Fecal Densities Reduce the Sensitivity of Screening Methods for Vancomycin Resistance in Enterococci
title_full_unstemmed Low Vancomycin MICs and Fecal Densities Reduce the Sensitivity of Screening Methods for Vancomycin Resistance in Enterococci
title_short Low Vancomycin MICs and Fecal Densities Reduce the Sensitivity of Screening Methods for Vancomycin Resistance in Enterococci
title_sort low vancomycin mics and fecal densities reduce the sensitivity of screening methods for vancomycin resistance in enterococci
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/32427