Electrochemical behaviour and voltammetric sensitivity at arrays of nanoscale interfaces between immiscible liquids

Arrays of nanoscale interfaces between immiscible electrolyte solutions were formed using siliconnitride nanopore array membranes. Nanopores in the range from 75 nm radius down to 17 nm radiuswere used to form the nano-interfaces. It was found that the liquid organic phase electrolyte solutionfilled...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rimboud, Mickael, Hart, Robert, Becker, Thomas, Arrigan, Damien
Format: Journal Article
Published: Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31501
_version_ 1848753397694464000
author Rimboud, Mickael
Hart, Robert
Becker, Thomas
Arrigan, Damien
author_facet Rimboud, Mickael
Hart, Robert
Becker, Thomas
Arrigan, Damien
author_sort Rimboud, Mickael
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Arrays of nanoscale interfaces between immiscible electrolyte solutions were formed using siliconnitride nanopore array membranes. Nanopores in the range from 75 nm radius down to 17 nm radiuswere used to form the nano-interfaces. It was found that the liquid organic phase electrolyte solutionfilled the pores so that inlaid nano-interfaces were formed with the aqueous phase. Cyclic voltammetryat these nano-interface arrays demonstrated steady-state behaviour at the larger interfaces but thevoltammetric wave-shape became progressively worse as the interface size decreased. It was found thatthe ion transfer currents were ca. 50% of those expected based on theoretical calculations, which isattributed to overlap of diffusion zones at adjacent nano-interfaces. Here, the separation betweenadjacent nano-interfaces was 20-times the interface radius. The analytical sensitivity for ion transferfrom the aqueous to the 1,6-dichlorohexane organic phase was estimated from calibration plots ofcurrent density versus concentration of aqueous tetraethylammonium cation. The sensitivity was in therange of 65 mA cm2 mM1 (at 75 nm radius interfaces) to 265 mA cm2 mM1 (at 17 nm radiusinterfaces). The sensitivity depended directly on the inverse of the nano-interface radius, implying thatsmaller interfaces will provide better sensitivity, due to the enhanced flux of analyte arising fromconvergent diffusion to smaller electrochemical interfaces.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:23:52Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-31501
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:23:52Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Royal Society of Chemistry
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-315012017-09-13T15:55:37Z Electrochemical behaviour and voltammetric sensitivity at arrays of nanoscale interfaces between immiscible liquids Rimboud, Mickael Hart, Robert Becker, Thomas Arrigan, Damien voltammetric sensitivity electrochemical behaviour arraya nanoscale interfaces Arrays of nanoscale interfaces between immiscible electrolyte solutions were formed using siliconnitride nanopore array membranes. Nanopores in the range from 75 nm radius down to 17 nm radiuswere used to form the nano-interfaces. It was found that the liquid organic phase electrolyte solutionfilled the pores so that inlaid nano-interfaces were formed with the aqueous phase. Cyclic voltammetryat these nano-interface arrays demonstrated steady-state behaviour at the larger interfaces but thevoltammetric wave-shape became progressively worse as the interface size decreased. It was found thatthe ion transfer currents were ca. 50% of those expected based on theoretical calculations, which isattributed to overlap of diffusion zones at adjacent nano-interfaces. Here, the separation betweenadjacent nano-interfaces was 20-times the interface radius. The analytical sensitivity for ion transferfrom the aqueous to the 1,6-dichlorohexane organic phase was estimated from calibration plots ofcurrent density versus concentration of aqueous tetraethylammonium cation. The sensitivity was in therange of 65 mA cm2 mM1 (at 75 nm radius interfaces) to 265 mA cm2 mM1 (at 17 nm radiusinterfaces). The sensitivity depended directly on the inverse of the nano-interface radius, implying thatsmaller interfaces will provide better sensitivity, due to the enhanced flux of analyte arising fromconvergent diffusion to smaller electrochemical interfaces. 2011 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31501 10.1039/C1AN15509A Royal Society of Chemistry fulltext
spellingShingle voltammetric sensitivity
electrochemical behaviour
arraya
nanoscale interfaces
Rimboud, Mickael
Hart, Robert
Becker, Thomas
Arrigan, Damien
Electrochemical behaviour and voltammetric sensitivity at arrays of nanoscale interfaces between immiscible liquids
title Electrochemical behaviour and voltammetric sensitivity at arrays of nanoscale interfaces between immiscible liquids
title_full Electrochemical behaviour and voltammetric sensitivity at arrays of nanoscale interfaces between immiscible liquids
title_fullStr Electrochemical behaviour and voltammetric sensitivity at arrays of nanoscale interfaces between immiscible liquids
title_full_unstemmed Electrochemical behaviour and voltammetric sensitivity at arrays of nanoscale interfaces between immiscible liquids
title_short Electrochemical behaviour and voltammetric sensitivity at arrays of nanoscale interfaces between immiscible liquids
title_sort electrochemical behaviour and voltammetric sensitivity at arrays of nanoscale interfaces between immiscible liquids
topic voltammetric sensitivity
electrochemical behaviour
arraya
nanoscale interfaces
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31501