Repeat pulmonary rehabilitation programs confer similar increases in functional exercise capacity to initial programs

PURPOSE: The benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) diminish over 12 to 24 months following program completion. In many jurisdictions, patients may be offered a repeat program if they report a decrement in exercise capacity. The aim of this study was to compare measures of functional exercise cap...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hill, Kylie, Bansal, V., Brooks, D., Goldstein, R.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2008
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/3121
_version_ 1848744144491511808
author Hill, Kylie
Bansal, V.
Brooks, D.
Goldstein, R.
author_facet Hill, Kylie
Bansal, V.
Brooks, D.
Goldstein, R.
author_sort Hill, Kylie
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description PURPOSE: The benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) diminish over 12 to 24 months following program completion. In many jurisdictions, patients may be offered a repeat program if they report a decrement in exercise capacity. The aim of this study was to compare measures of functional exercise capacity collected during initial and repeat PR programs. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was conducted for patients who completed a minimum of 4 consecutive weeks of inpatient PR at our facility in 2001. Measures included the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and time to symptom limitation during an endurance walk (EWT) collected prior to and on completion of the initial PR program (year 2001) and, where possible, the first repeat program completed between years 2001 and 2006. RESULTS: Of 76 patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 second = 40 ± 19% predicted; 34 males), 17 repeated PR 25.1 ± 18.4 months after the 2001 program. Change in the 6MWD during the initial program was 37.1 m greater in repeaters than in nonrepeaters (P = .036). In repeaters, the 6MWD measured before commencing the repeat PR program was 45.1 ± 63.7 m lower than the 6MWD measured prior to the initial PR program (P = .013). Improvements in the 6MWD (90.6 ± 70.0 m vs 78.4 ± 83.8 m; P = .43) and the EWT (21 ± 11 minutes vs 21 ± 11 minutes; P = .87) were similar between the initial and repeat programs. CONCLUSION: Similar gains in functional exercise capacity were achieved on completion of initial and repeat PR programs. The large decrement in the 6MWD between PR programs spaced 25 months apart suggests that a shorter time period is needed between programs. © 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T05:56:48Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-3121
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T05:56:48Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-31212017-09-13T14:33:02Z Repeat pulmonary rehabilitation programs confer similar increases in functional exercise capacity to initial programs Hill, Kylie Bansal, V. Brooks, D. Goldstein, R. PURPOSE: The benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) diminish over 12 to 24 months following program completion. In many jurisdictions, patients may be offered a repeat program if they report a decrement in exercise capacity. The aim of this study was to compare measures of functional exercise capacity collected during initial and repeat PR programs. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was conducted for patients who completed a minimum of 4 consecutive weeks of inpatient PR at our facility in 2001. Measures included the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and time to symptom limitation during an endurance walk (EWT) collected prior to and on completion of the initial PR program (year 2001) and, where possible, the first repeat program completed between years 2001 and 2006. RESULTS: Of 76 patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 second = 40 ± 19% predicted; 34 males), 17 repeated PR 25.1 ± 18.4 months after the 2001 program. Change in the 6MWD during the initial program was 37.1 m greater in repeaters than in nonrepeaters (P = .036). In repeaters, the 6MWD measured before commencing the repeat PR program was 45.1 ± 63.7 m lower than the 6MWD measured prior to the initial PR program (P = .013). Improvements in the 6MWD (90.6 ± 70.0 m vs 78.4 ± 83.8 m; P = .43) and the EWT (21 ± 11 minutes vs 21 ± 11 minutes; P = .87) were similar between the initial and repeat programs. CONCLUSION: Similar gains in functional exercise capacity were achieved on completion of initial and repeat PR programs. The large decrement in the 6MWD between PR programs spaced 25 months apart suggests that a shorter time period is needed between programs. © 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 2008 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/3121 10.1097/HCR.0b013e31818c3c8d Lippincott Williams & Wilkins restricted
spellingShingle Hill, Kylie
Bansal, V.
Brooks, D.
Goldstein, R.
Repeat pulmonary rehabilitation programs confer similar increases in functional exercise capacity to initial programs
title Repeat pulmonary rehabilitation programs confer similar increases in functional exercise capacity to initial programs
title_full Repeat pulmonary rehabilitation programs confer similar increases in functional exercise capacity to initial programs
title_fullStr Repeat pulmonary rehabilitation programs confer similar increases in functional exercise capacity to initial programs
title_full_unstemmed Repeat pulmonary rehabilitation programs confer similar increases in functional exercise capacity to initial programs
title_short Repeat pulmonary rehabilitation programs confer similar increases in functional exercise capacity to initial programs
title_sort repeat pulmonary rehabilitation programs confer similar increases in functional exercise capacity to initial programs
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/3121