The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control in young adults

Background: There is increasing evidence that the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a brain region related to reward and motivational processes, is involved in effective response inhibition and that decreased activity in this region coincides with reduced inhibitory capacity. Using transcrani...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Loftus, Andrea, Yalcin, O., Baughman, Frank, Vanman, E., Hagger, Martin
Format: Journal Article
Published: John Wiley and Sons Ltd 2015
Online Access:http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP130103277
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31184
_version_ 1848753306576355328
author Loftus, Andrea
Yalcin, O.
Baughman, Frank
Vanman, E.
Hagger, Martin
author_facet Loftus, Andrea
Yalcin, O.
Baughman, Frank
Vanman, E.
Hagger, Martin
author_sort Loftus, Andrea
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: There is increasing evidence that the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a brain region related to reward and motivational processes, is involved in effective response inhibition and that decreased activity in this region coincides with reduced inhibitory capacity. Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to manipulate cortical activation, this study examined whether cross-hemispheric tDCS over the DLPFC affected performance on an inhibitory control task. Methods: Neurologically intact participants performed a modified Stroop color-word matching task before and after completing one of two tDCS conditions; (1) anodal stimulation over the left DLPFC or (2) sham tDCS. Results: There was a statistically significant effect of tDCS condition on Stroop reaction time (RT) pre-post tDCS change scores. Participants who received anodal stimulation over the left DLPFC demonstrated statistically significant faster RT change scores on the Stroop items compared to participants in the sham condition. Although errors on Stroop incongruent items decreased before and after receiving the tDCS treatment, there were no significant differences in errors on Stroop items between the anodal stimulation over left DLPFC and sham tDCS conditions. Anodal tDCS, which is known to elevate neural excitation, may have enhanced activation levels in the left DLPFC and minimized impairment of inhibitory control, resulting in better task performance. Conclusions: Current findings provide preliminary evidence that increased excitation of the left DLPFC improves inhibitory control and are a step toward understanding the potential of tDCS for moderating deficits in inhibitory control.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:22:25Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-31184
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:22:25Z
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-311842017-09-13T15:11:18Z The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control in young adults Loftus, Andrea Yalcin, O. Baughman, Frank Vanman, E. Hagger, Martin Background: There is increasing evidence that the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a brain region related to reward and motivational processes, is involved in effective response inhibition and that decreased activity in this region coincides with reduced inhibitory capacity. Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to manipulate cortical activation, this study examined whether cross-hemispheric tDCS over the DLPFC affected performance on an inhibitory control task. Methods: Neurologically intact participants performed a modified Stroop color-word matching task before and after completing one of two tDCS conditions; (1) anodal stimulation over the left DLPFC or (2) sham tDCS. Results: There was a statistically significant effect of tDCS condition on Stroop reaction time (RT) pre-post tDCS change scores. Participants who received anodal stimulation over the left DLPFC demonstrated statistically significant faster RT change scores on the Stroop items compared to participants in the sham condition. Although errors on Stroop incongruent items decreased before and after receiving the tDCS treatment, there were no significant differences in errors on Stroop items between the anodal stimulation over left DLPFC and sham tDCS conditions. Anodal tDCS, which is known to elevate neural excitation, may have enhanced activation levels in the left DLPFC and minimized impairment of inhibitory control, resulting in better task performance. Conclusions: Current findings provide preliminary evidence that increased excitation of the left DLPFC improves inhibitory control and are a step toward understanding the potential of tDCS for moderating deficits in inhibitory control. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31184 10.1002/brb3.332 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP130103277 John Wiley and Sons Ltd fulltext
spellingShingle Loftus, Andrea
Yalcin, O.
Baughman, Frank
Vanman, E.
Hagger, Martin
The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control in young adults
title The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control in young adults
title_full The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control in young adults
title_fullStr The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control in young adults
title_full_unstemmed The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control in young adults
title_short The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control in young adults
title_sort impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control in young adults
url http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP130103277
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31184