Psychosexual problems in general practice: measuring consultation competence using two different measures

BACKGROUND: Psychosexual problems are a common presentation in general practice. Given that the cornerstone of assessment is excellent consultations skills, it may be assumed that general practitioners (GPs) will perform skilfully for such presentations. AIM: To determine if there is a significant d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiwa, Moyez, O'shea, C., Merriman, G., Halkett, Georgia, Spilsbury, Katrina
Format: Journal Article
Published: Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd. 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31075
_version_ 1848753273711886336
author Jiwa, Moyez
O'shea, C.
Merriman, G.
Halkett, Georgia
Spilsbury, Katrina
author_facet Jiwa, Moyez
O'shea, C.
Merriman, G.
Halkett, Georgia
Spilsbury, Katrina
author_sort Jiwa, Moyez
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description BACKGROUND: Psychosexual problems are a common presentation in general practice. Given that the cornerstone of assessment is excellent consultations skills, it may be assumed that general practitioners (GPs) will perform skilfully for such presentations. AIM: To determine if there is a significant difference in consultation skills assessed using a generic test of consultation performance compared to one which has been specifically developed for experts in psychosexual care, albeit modified for general practice consultations. METHODS: Six GPs were video recorded consulting six standardised patients at their respective practices. Two assessors independently rated the consultation performance using the Leicester Assessment Package (LAP), a generic tool to assess GP consultation performance. Four sexologists, blind to the review by the LAP assessors, assessed the same consultations deploying the Permission, Limited Information, Specific Suggestion, Intensive Therapy (PLISSIT) framework. The PLISSIT is routinely used to teach health professionals communication skills when consulting people with psychosexual problems.RESULTS: Thirty-four consultations were successfully recorded. The mean duration of consultations was 12 minutes and 10 seconds (range 7 m. 54 s. to 16 m. 54 s.). Three GPs differed significantly in core competencies as measured by the LAP. Similarly, three GPs differed in competencies as measured by the PLISSIT. There were significant differences in mean LAP scores and PLISSIT scores observed for different doctors. Mean LAP scores varied by actor-scenario after adjusting for doctor clustering, whereas PLISSIT scoring did not vary significantly by actor-scenario in this small study with limited power. There was no evidence that mean LAP scores were associated with PLISSIT scores. CONCLUSIONS: Two measures of consultation competence revealed different outcomes when applied to the same consultations. We found evidence that general practitioners vary significantly on different measures of consultation competence when consulting patients with psychosexual problems in the context of a cancer diagnosis.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:21:54Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-31075
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:21:54Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd.
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-310752021-01-28T05:16:05Z Psychosexual problems in general practice: measuring consultation competence using two different measures Jiwa, Moyez O'shea, C. Merriman, G. Halkett, Georgia Spilsbury, Katrina BACKGROUND: Psychosexual problems are a common presentation in general practice. Given that the cornerstone of assessment is excellent consultations skills, it may be assumed that general practitioners (GPs) will perform skilfully for such presentations. AIM: To determine if there is a significant difference in consultation skills assessed using a generic test of consultation performance compared to one which has been specifically developed for experts in psychosexual care, albeit modified for general practice consultations. METHODS: Six GPs were video recorded consulting six standardised patients at their respective practices. Two assessors independently rated the consultation performance using the Leicester Assessment Package (LAP), a generic tool to assess GP consultation performance. Four sexologists, blind to the review by the LAP assessors, assessed the same consultations deploying the Permission, Limited Information, Specific Suggestion, Intensive Therapy (PLISSIT) framework. The PLISSIT is routinely used to teach health professionals communication skills when consulting people with psychosexual problems.RESULTS: Thirty-four consultations were successfully recorded. The mean duration of consultations was 12 minutes and 10 seconds (range 7 m. 54 s. to 16 m. 54 s.). Three GPs differed significantly in core competencies as measured by the LAP. Similarly, three GPs differed in competencies as measured by the PLISSIT. There were significant differences in mean LAP scores and PLISSIT scores observed for different doctors. Mean LAP scores varied by actor-scenario after adjusting for doctor clustering, whereas PLISSIT scoring did not vary significantly by actor-scenario in this small study with limited power. There was no evidence that mean LAP scores were associated with PLISSIT scores. CONCLUSIONS: Two measures of consultation competence revealed different outcomes when applied to the same consultations. We found evidence that general practitioners vary significantly on different measures of consultation competence when consulting patients with psychosexual problems in the context of a cancer diagnosis. 2010 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31075 Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd. restricted
spellingShingle Jiwa, Moyez
O'shea, C.
Merriman, G.
Halkett, Georgia
Spilsbury, Katrina
Psychosexual problems in general practice: measuring consultation competence using two different measures
title Psychosexual problems in general practice: measuring consultation competence using two different measures
title_full Psychosexual problems in general practice: measuring consultation competence using two different measures
title_fullStr Psychosexual problems in general practice: measuring consultation competence using two different measures
title_full_unstemmed Psychosexual problems in general practice: measuring consultation competence using two different measures
title_short Psychosexual problems in general practice: measuring consultation competence using two different measures
title_sort psychosexual problems in general practice: measuring consultation competence using two different measures
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31075