Their Evil Lies in the Grapevine Effect: Assessment of Damages in Defamation by Social Media

The number of cases of defamation by social media is growing. This article examines the principles of assessment of damages as they apply to those cases. In particular, the article examines the concept of the ‘grapevine effect’: a metaphor used to explain the basis for recovery of general damages fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Douglas, Michael
Format: Journal Article
Published: LexisNexis Butterworths 2015
Online Access:http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2811967
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30905
_version_ 1848753224996093952
author Douglas, Michael
author_facet Douglas, Michael
author_sort Douglas, Michael
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The number of cases of defamation by social media is growing. This article examines the principles of assessment of damages as they apply to those cases. In particular, the article examines the concept of the ‘grapevine effect’: a metaphor used to explain the basis for recovery of general damages for defamation. The grapevine effect has been deployed to notable effect in recent cases of publication by social media. The article argues that the role of the ‘grapevine effect’ reflects the purposes of awards of damages for defamation in light of the unique characteristics of social media.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:21:07Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-30905
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:21:07Z
publishDate 2015
publisher LexisNexis Butterworths
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-309052018-12-14T00:52:18Z Their Evil Lies in the Grapevine Effect: Assessment of Damages in Defamation by Social Media Douglas, Michael The number of cases of defamation by social media is growing. This article examines the principles of assessment of damages as they apply to those cases. In particular, the article examines the concept of the ‘grapevine effect’: a metaphor used to explain the basis for recovery of general damages for defamation. The grapevine effect has been deployed to notable effect in recent cases of publication by social media. The article argues that the role of the ‘grapevine effect’ reflects the purposes of awards of damages for defamation in light of the unique characteristics of social media. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30905 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2811967 LexisNexis Butterworths restricted
spellingShingle Douglas, Michael
Their Evil Lies in the Grapevine Effect: Assessment of Damages in Defamation by Social Media
title Their Evil Lies in the Grapevine Effect: Assessment of Damages in Defamation by Social Media
title_full Their Evil Lies in the Grapevine Effect: Assessment of Damages in Defamation by Social Media
title_fullStr Their Evil Lies in the Grapevine Effect: Assessment of Damages in Defamation by Social Media
title_full_unstemmed Their Evil Lies in the Grapevine Effect: Assessment of Damages in Defamation by Social Media
title_short Their Evil Lies in the Grapevine Effect: Assessment of Damages in Defamation by Social Media
title_sort their evil lies in the grapevine effect: assessment of damages in defamation by social media
url http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2811967
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30905