Towards a unified theory of GNSS ambiguity resolution
Abstract. In this invited contribution a brief review will be presented of the integer estimation theory as developed by the author over the last decade and which started with the introduction of the LAMBDA method in 1993. The review discusses three different, but closely related classes of ambiguit...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
International Association of Chinese Professionals in Global Positioning Systems (CPGPS)
2003
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30743 |
| _version_ | 1848753176671420416 |
|---|---|
| author | Teunissen, Peter |
| author_facet | Teunissen, Peter |
| author_sort | Teunissen, Peter |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Abstract. In this invited contribution a brief review will be presented of the integer estimation theory as developed by the author over the last decade and which started with the introduction of the LAMBDA method in 1993. The review discusses three different, but closely related classes of ambiguity estimators. They are the integer estimators, the integer aperture estimators and the integer equivarian-testimators. Integer estimators are integer aperture estimators and integer aperture estimators are integer equivariant estimators. The reverse is not necessarily true however. Thus of the three types of estimators the integer estimators are the most restrictive. Their pull-in regions are translational invariant, disjunct and they cover the ambiguity space completely. Well-known examples are integerrounding, integer bootstrapping and integer least-squares. A less restrictive class of estimators is the class of integer aperture estimators. Their pull-in regions only obey two of the three conditions. They are still translational invariant and disjunct, but they do not need to cover the ambiguity space completely. As a consequence the integer aperture estimators are of a hybrid nature having either integer or non-integer outcomes. Examples of integer aperture estimators are the ratio-testimator and the difference-testimator. The class of integer equivariant estimators is the less restrictive of the three classes. These estimators only obey one of the three conditions, namely the condition of being translational invariant. As a consequence the outcomes of integer equivariant estimators are always realvalued. For each of the three classes of estimators we also present the optimal estimator. Although the Gaussian case is usually assumed, the results are presented for an arbitrary probability density function of the float solution. The optimal integer estimator in the Gaussian case is the integerleast-squares estimator.The optimality criterion used is that of maximizing the probability of correct integer estimation, the so-called success rate. The optimal integer aperture estimator in the Gaussian case is the one which only returns the integer least-squares solution when the integer least-squares residual resides in the optimal aperture pull-in region. This region is governed by the probability density function of the float solution and by the probability density function of the integer least-squares residual. The aperture of the pull-in region is governed by a user defined aperture parameter. The optimality criterion used is that of maximizing the probability of correct integer estimation given a fixed, user-defined, probability of incorrect integer estimation. The optimal integer aperture estimator becomes identical to the optimal integer estimator in case the success rate and the fail rate sum up to one.The best integer equivariant estimator is an infinite weighted sum of all integers. The weights are determined as ratios of the probability density function of the float solution with its train of integer shifted copies. The optimality criterion used is that of minimizing the mean squared error. The best integer equivariant estimator therefore always out performs the float solution in terms of precision. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T08:20:21Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-30743 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T08:20:21Z |
| publishDate | 2003 |
| publisher | International Association of Chinese Professionals in Global Positioning Systems (CPGPS) |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-307432017-01-30T13:21:20Z Towards a unified theory of GNSS ambiguity resolution Teunissen, Peter integer estimation integer aperture estimation integer equivariant estimation GNSS ambiguity resolution Abstract. In this invited contribution a brief review will be presented of the integer estimation theory as developed by the author over the last decade and which started with the introduction of the LAMBDA method in 1993. The review discusses three different, but closely related classes of ambiguity estimators. They are the integer estimators, the integer aperture estimators and the integer equivarian-testimators. Integer estimators are integer aperture estimators and integer aperture estimators are integer equivariant estimators. The reverse is not necessarily true however. Thus of the three types of estimators the integer estimators are the most restrictive. Their pull-in regions are translational invariant, disjunct and they cover the ambiguity space completely. Well-known examples are integerrounding, integer bootstrapping and integer least-squares. A less restrictive class of estimators is the class of integer aperture estimators. Their pull-in regions only obey two of the three conditions. They are still translational invariant and disjunct, but they do not need to cover the ambiguity space completely. As a consequence the integer aperture estimators are of a hybrid nature having either integer or non-integer outcomes. Examples of integer aperture estimators are the ratio-testimator and the difference-testimator. The class of integer equivariant estimators is the less restrictive of the three classes. These estimators only obey one of the three conditions, namely the condition of being translational invariant. As a consequence the outcomes of integer equivariant estimators are always realvalued. For each of the three classes of estimators we also present the optimal estimator. Although the Gaussian case is usually assumed, the results are presented for an arbitrary probability density function of the float solution. The optimal integer estimator in the Gaussian case is the integerleast-squares estimator.The optimality criterion used is that of maximizing the probability of correct integer estimation, the so-called success rate. The optimal integer aperture estimator in the Gaussian case is the one which only returns the integer least-squares solution when the integer least-squares residual resides in the optimal aperture pull-in region. This region is governed by the probability density function of the float solution and by the probability density function of the integer least-squares residual. The aperture of the pull-in region is governed by a user defined aperture parameter. The optimality criterion used is that of maximizing the probability of correct integer estimation given a fixed, user-defined, probability of incorrect integer estimation. The optimal integer aperture estimator becomes identical to the optimal integer estimator in case the success rate and the fail rate sum up to one.The best integer equivariant estimator is an infinite weighted sum of all integers. The weights are determined as ratios of the probability density function of the float solution with its train of integer shifted copies. The optimality criterion used is that of minimizing the mean squared error. The best integer equivariant estimator therefore always out performs the float solution in terms of precision. 2003 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30743 International Association of Chinese Professionals in Global Positioning Systems (CPGPS) fulltext |
| spellingShingle | integer estimation integer aperture estimation integer equivariant estimation GNSS ambiguity resolution Teunissen, Peter Towards a unified theory of GNSS ambiguity resolution |
| title | Towards a unified theory of GNSS ambiguity resolution |
| title_full | Towards a unified theory of GNSS ambiguity resolution |
| title_fullStr | Towards a unified theory of GNSS ambiguity resolution |
| title_full_unstemmed | Towards a unified theory of GNSS ambiguity resolution |
| title_short | Towards a unified theory of GNSS ambiguity resolution |
| title_sort | towards a unified theory of gnss ambiguity resolution |
| topic | integer estimation integer aperture estimation integer equivariant estimation GNSS ambiguity resolution |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30743 |