Grounded Theory of International Tourism Behavior

The dominant logic in conventional research methods involves collecting and analyzing data to rigorously test a deductive theory. In contrast, grounded theory posits constructing theory from data (Glaser & Strauss, 1967). This analysis demonstrates the application of McCracken's (1988) long...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin, D., Woodside, Arch
Format: Journal Article
Published: Routledge 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/3054
_version_ 1848744125121167360
author Martin, D.
Woodside, Arch
author_facet Martin, D.
Woodside, Arch
author_sort Martin, D.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The dominant logic in conventional research methods involves collecting and analyzing data to rigorously test a deductive theory. In contrast, grounded theory posits constructing theory from data (Glaser & Strauss, 1967). This analysis demonstrates the application of McCracken's (1988) long interview method to collect data for grounded theory development. Both emic (self) and etic (researcher) interpretations of international visitor experiences uncover important insights on leisure travel decisions and tourist behavior. Long interviews of tourists visiting Hawaii's Big Island enable mapping and comparing visitors' plans, motivations, decisions, and consequences. The results demonstrate the complexity of visitors' travel decisions and behavior.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T05:56:29Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-3054
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T05:56:29Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Routledge
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-30542017-09-13T14:31:37Z Grounded Theory of International Tourism Behavior Martin, D. Woodside, Arch International tourism behavior Hawaii Germany Japan grounded theory long interview method The dominant logic in conventional research methods involves collecting and analyzing data to rigorously test a deductive theory. In contrast, grounded theory posits constructing theory from data (Glaser & Strauss, 1967). This analysis demonstrates the application of McCracken's (1988) long interview method to collect data for grounded theory development. Both emic (self) and etic (researcher) interpretations of international visitor experiences uncover important insights on leisure travel decisions and tourist behavior. Long interviews of tourists visiting Hawaii's Big Island enable mapping and comparing visitors' plans, motivations, decisions, and consequences. The results demonstrate the complexity of visitors' travel decisions and behavior. 2008 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/3054 10.1080/10548400802156695 Routledge restricted
spellingShingle International tourism behavior
Hawaii
Germany
Japan
grounded theory long interview method
Martin, D.
Woodside, Arch
Grounded Theory of International Tourism Behavior
title Grounded Theory of International Tourism Behavior
title_full Grounded Theory of International Tourism Behavior
title_fullStr Grounded Theory of International Tourism Behavior
title_full_unstemmed Grounded Theory of International Tourism Behavior
title_short Grounded Theory of International Tourism Behavior
title_sort grounded theory of international tourism behavior
topic International tourism behavior
Hawaii
Germany
Japan
grounded theory long interview method
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/3054