Predictors for urologic intervention and alternate diagnoses in people having computed tomography urography for suspected renal colic

Objective: The majority of ureteric calculi pass spontaneously and are uncomplicated, yet use of computed tomography urography (CTU) has increased in recent years. This study describes a cohort of ED patients undergoing CTU for renal colic and assesses the predictors of urologic intervention. Method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blecher, G., Meek, R., Egerton-Warburton, Diana, McCahy, P., Bach, C., Boulos, D.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30528
_version_ 1848753114304217088
author Blecher, G.
Meek, R.
Egerton-Warburton, Diana
McCahy, P.
Bach, C.
Boulos, D.
author_facet Blecher, G.
Meek, R.
Egerton-Warburton, Diana
McCahy, P.
Bach, C.
Boulos, D.
author_sort Blecher, G.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Objective: The majority of ureteric calculi pass spontaneously and are uncomplicated, yet use of computed tomography urography (CTU) has increased in recent years. This study describes a cohort of ED patients undergoing CTU for renal colic and assesses the predictors of urologic intervention. Methods: A retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who underwent CTU at three Melbourne EDs. Demographic data, clinical assessments, laboratory and radiological findings and interventions were abstracted. Univariate analysis was performed and significant predictors were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model to calculate adjusted odds ratios for associations with urologic intervention. Results: Six hundred and seventeen patients underwent 626 CTUs; mean age was 48 and 67.7% were male. 58.2% of scans found calculi, of which median size was 4mm. 9.2% of scans revealed an alternate diagnosis, of which 2.7% were acutely important. 14.6% of patients with calculi received an intervention. Multivariate analysis found the factors associated with intervention were female sex (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.8-8.7), proximal calculus site (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.5-11.7), single kidney (OR 9.0, 95% CI 1.7-49.0) and calculus size>5mm (OR 7.0, 95% CI 3.3-14.7). Conclusion: Factors associated with urologic intervention included female sex, single kidney, calculus size >5mm and proximal calculus. Information on acute alternate diagnoses was uncommon. A prospective study is needed to further clarify clinical parameters that could predict intervention to allow targeting of CTU to those most likely to benefit. EMA
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:19:22Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-30528
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:19:22Z
publishDate 2016
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-305282018-12-14T00:57:38Z Predictors for urologic intervention and alternate diagnoses in people having computed tomography urography for suspected renal colic Blecher, G. Meek, R. Egerton-Warburton, Diana McCahy, P. Bach, C. Boulos, D. Objective: The majority of ureteric calculi pass spontaneously and are uncomplicated, yet use of computed tomography urography (CTU) has increased in recent years. This study describes a cohort of ED patients undergoing CTU for renal colic and assesses the predictors of urologic intervention. Methods: A retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who underwent CTU at three Melbourne EDs. Demographic data, clinical assessments, laboratory and radiological findings and interventions were abstracted. Univariate analysis was performed and significant predictors were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model to calculate adjusted odds ratios for associations with urologic intervention. Results: Six hundred and seventeen patients underwent 626 CTUs; mean age was 48 and 67.7% were male. 58.2% of scans found calculi, of which median size was 4mm. 9.2% of scans revealed an alternate diagnosis, of which 2.7% were acutely important. 14.6% of patients with calculi received an intervention. Multivariate analysis found the factors associated with intervention were female sex (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.8-8.7), proximal calculus site (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.5-11.7), single kidney (OR 9.0, 95% CI 1.7-49.0) and calculus size>5mm (OR 7.0, 95% CI 3.3-14.7). Conclusion: Factors associated with urologic intervention included female sex, single kidney, calculus size >5mm and proximal calculus. Information on acute alternate diagnoses was uncommon. A prospective study is needed to further clarify clinical parameters that could predict intervention to allow targeting of CTU to those most likely to benefit. EMA 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30528 10.1111/1742-6723.12523 restricted
spellingShingle Blecher, G.
Meek, R.
Egerton-Warburton, Diana
McCahy, P.
Bach, C.
Boulos, D.
Predictors for urologic intervention and alternate diagnoses in people having computed tomography urography for suspected renal colic
title Predictors for urologic intervention and alternate diagnoses in people having computed tomography urography for suspected renal colic
title_full Predictors for urologic intervention and alternate diagnoses in people having computed tomography urography for suspected renal colic
title_fullStr Predictors for urologic intervention and alternate diagnoses in people having computed tomography urography for suspected renal colic
title_full_unstemmed Predictors for urologic intervention and alternate diagnoses in people having computed tomography urography for suspected renal colic
title_short Predictors for urologic intervention and alternate diagnoses in people having computed tomography urography for suspected renal colic
title_sort predictors for urologic intervention and alternate diagnoses in people having computed tomography urography for suspected renal colic
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30528