An accuracy assessment of the fan wavelet coherence method for elastic thickness estimation

A variety of methods exist to estimate the elastic thickness (T e ) of the lithosphere. In this contribution, we attempt to provide an indication of how well the fan wavelet coherence method recovers T e , through synthetic modeling. The procedure involves simulating initial topographic and subsurfa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kirby, Jonathan, Swain, Christopher
Format: Journal Article
Published: Americal Geophysical Union 2008
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30017
_version_ 1848752966648987648
author Kirby, Jonathan
Swain, Christopher
author_facet Kirby, Jonathan
Swain, Christopher
author_sort Kirby, Jonathan
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description A variety of methods exist to estimate the elastic thickness (T e ) of the lithosphere. In this contribution, we attempt to provide an indication of how well the fan wavelet coherence method recovers T e , through synthetic modeling. The procedure involves simulating initial topographic and subsurface loads and emplacing them on a thin elastic plate of known T e , generating the postloading topography and gravity. We then attempt to recover that T e distribution from the gravity and topography through the wavelet method, hence discovering where its strengths and weaknesses lie. The T e distributions we use here have elliptical and fractal geometries, while the initial loads are fractal. Importantly, we have found that this widely used synthetic loading calibration method will tend to result in underestimates of T e no matter which recovery method is used. This is due to random correlations between the initial loads which, on average, serve to increase their coherence at all wavelengths and spatial locations. For the fan wavelet method, the degree of underestimation from this “background” source is approximately 10% of the true T e . In addition, the fan wavelet coherence method will provide underestimates of (1) the true T e when the study area size is of the order of the highest flexural wavelength or less, (2) relative T e differences when the T e anomaly is narrow compared to its flexural wavelength, and (3) steep T e gradients. Significantly, we find that the recovery is not greatly affected by the assumption of uniform T e in the inversion of the coherence. We also find that T e recovery from the coherence is only weakly dependent upon the initial subsurface-to-surface loading ratio (f). In contrast to the coherence, T e recovery from the admittance is highly “noisy,” with discontinuities and overestimates of T e frequently arising. This is most likely due to the high sensitivity of the admittance to f and is likely to apply to real data as well.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:17:01Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-30017
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:17:01Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Americal Geophysical Union
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-300172019-02-19T04:27:35Z An accuracy assessment of the fan wavelet coherence method for elastic thickness estimation Kirby, Jonathan Swain, Christopher A variety of methods exist to estimate the elastic thickness (T e ) of the lithosphere. In this contribution, we attempt to provide an indication of how well the fan wavelet coherence method recovers T e , through synthetic modeling. The procedure involves simulating initial topographic and subsurface loads and emplacing them on a thin elastic plate of known T e , generating the postloading topography and gravity. We then attempt to recover that T e distribution from the gravity and topography through the wavelet method, hence discovering where its strengths and weaknesses lie. The T e distributions we use here have elliptical and fractal geometries, while the initial loads are fractal. Importantly, we have found that this widely used synthetic loading calibration method will tend to result in underestimates of T e no matter which recovery method is used. This is due to random correlations between the initial loads which, on average, serve to increase their coherence at all wavelengths and spatial locations. For the fan wavelet method, the degree of underestimation from this “background” source is approximately 10% of the true T e . In addition, the fan wavelet coherence method will provide underestimates of (1) the true T e when the study area size is of the order of the highest flexural wavelength or less, (2) relative T e differences when the T e anomaly is narrow compared to its flexural wavelength, and (3) steep T e gradients. Significantly, we find that the recovery is not greatly affected by the assumption of uniform T e in the inversion of the coherence. We also find that T e recovery from the coherence is only weakly dependent upon the initial subsurface-to-surface loading ratio (f). In contrast to the coherence, T e recovery from the admittance is highly “noisy,” with discontinuities and overestimates of T e frequently arising. This is most likely due to the high sensitivity of the admittance to f and is likely to apply to real data as well. 2008 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30017 10.1029/2007GC001773 Americal Geophysical Union fulltext
spellingShingle Kirby, Jonathan
Swain, Christopher
An accuracy assessment of the fan wavelet coherence method for elastic thickness estimation
title An accuracy assessment of the fan wavelet coherence method for elastic thickness estimation
title_full An accuracy assessment of the fan wavelet coherence method for elastic thickness estimation
title_fullStr An accuracy assessment of the fan wavelet coherence method for elastic thickness estimation
title_full_unstemmed An accuracy assessment of the fan wavelet coherence method for elastic thickness estimation
title_short An accuracy assessment of the fan wavelet coherence method for elastic thickness estimation
title_sort accuracy assessment of the fan wavelet coherence method for elastic thickness estimation
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30017