Hidden Populations, Online Purposive Sampling, and External Validity: Taking off the Blindfold

Online purposive samples have unknown biases and may not strictly be used to make inferences about wider populations, yet such inferences continue to occur. We compared the demographic and drug use characteristics of Australian ecstasy users from a probability (National Drug Strategy Household Surve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barratt, Monica, Ferris, J., Lenton, Simon
Format: Journal Article
Published: Sage Publications 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/29282
_version_ 1848752761534939136
author Barratt, Monica
Ferris, J.
Lenton, Simon
author_facet Barratt, Monica
Ferris, J.
Lenton, Simon
author_sort Barratt, Monica
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Online purposive samples have unknown biases and may not strictly be used to make inferences about wider populations, yet such inferences continue to occur. We compared the demographic and drug use characteristics of Australian ecstasy users from a probability (National Drug Strategy Household Survey, n = 726) and purposive sample (online survey conducted as part of a mixed-methods study of online drug discussion, n = 753) using nonparametric (bootstrap) and meta-analysis techniques. We found significant differences in demographics and drug use prevalence. Ideally, online purposive samples of hidden populations should be interpreted in conjunction with probability samples and ethnographic fieldwork.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:13:46Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-29282
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:13:46Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Sage Publications
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-292822017-09-13T15:33:38Z Hidden Populations, Online Purposive Sampling, and External Validity: Taking off the Blindfold Barratt, Monica Ferris, J. Lenton, Simon hard-to-reach hidden populations sampling representativeness Internet Online purposive samples have unknown biases and may not strictly be used to make inferences about wider populations, yet such inferences continue to occur. We compared the demographic and drug use characteristics of Australian ecstasy users from a probability (National Drug Strategy Household Survey, n = 726) and purposive sample (online survey conducted as part of a mixed-methods study of online drug discussion, n = 753) using nonparametric (bootstrap) and meta-analysis techniques. We found significant differences in demographics and drug use prevalence. Ideally, online purposive samples of hidden populations should be interpreted in conjunction with probability samples and ethnographic fieldwork. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/29282 10.1177/1525822X14526838 Sage Publications fulltext
spellingShingle hard-to-reach
hidden populations
sampling
representativeness
Internet
Barratt, Monica
Ferris, J.
Lenton, Simon
Hidden Populations, Online Purposive Sampling, and External Validity: Taking off the Blindfold
title Hidden Populations, Online Purposive Sampling, and External Validity: Taking off the Blindfold
title_full Hidden Populations, Online Purposive Sampling, and External Validity: Taking off the Blindfold
title_fullStr Hidden Populations, Online Purposive Sampling, and External Validity: Taking off the Blindfold
title_full_unstemmed Hidden Populations, Online Purposive Sampling, and External Validity: Taking off the Blindfold
title_short Hidden Populations, Online Purposive Sampling, and External Validity: Taking off the Blindfold
title_sort hidden populations, online purposive sampling, and external validity: taking off the blindfold
topic hard-to-reach
hidden populations
sampling
representativeness
Internet
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/29282