Stakeholders, natural resource management and Australian rural local governments: A Q-methodological study

This paper reports on a Q methodological study of stakeholder perceptions of rural local government management of natural resources. Data analysis of the Q sorts revealed that there are five distinct stakeholder perspectives relating to rural local government and natural resource management. In term...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pini, B., Previte, J., McKenzie, Fiona Haslam
Format: Journal Article
Published: Local Government Studies 2007
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/29060
_version_ 1848752702300880896
author Pini, B.
Previte, J.
McKenzie, Fiona Haslam
author_facet Pini, B.
Previte, J.
McKenzie, Fiona Haslam
author_sort Pini, B.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This paper reports on a Q methodological study of stakeholder perceptions of rural local government management of natural resources. Data analysis of the Q sorts revealed that there are five distinct stakeholder perspectives relating to rural local government and natural resource management. In terms of natural resource management at the local level rural stakeholders perceive local government as an unwilling participant, an inconsequential participant, as a problematic participant, as a potential participant, and, most positively, a participatory partner. The paper describes each of these five stakeholder perspectives in detail before examining the implications of these findings for greater natural resource management at the local level in non-metropolitan Australia.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:12:49Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-29060
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:12:49Z
publishDate 2007
publisher Local Government Studies
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-290602019-02-19T04:28:11Z Stakeholders, natural resource management and Australian rural local governments: A Q-methodological study Pini, B. Previte, J. McKenzie, Fiona Haslam This paper reports on a Q methodological study of stakeholder perceptions of rural local government management of natural resources. Data analysis of the Q sorts revealed that there are five distinct stakeholder perspectives relating to rural local government and natural resource management. In terms of natural resource management at the local level rural stakeholders perceive local government as an unwilling participant, an inconsequential participant, as a problematic participant, as a potential participant, and, most positively, a participatory partner. The paper describes each of these five stakeholder perspectives in detail before examining the implications of these findings for greater natural resource management at the local level in non-metropolitan Australia. 2007 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/29060 10.1080/03003930701289638 Local Government Studies fulltext
spellingShingle Pini, B.
Previte, J.
McKenzie, Fiona Haslam
Stakeholders, natural resource management and Australian rural local governments: A Q-methodological study
title Stakeholders, natural resource management and Australian rural local governments: A Q-methodological study
title_full Stakeholders, natural resource management and Australian rural local governments: A Q-methodological study
title_fullStr Stakeholders, natural resource management and Australian rural local governments: A Q-methodological study
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholders, natural resource management and Australian rural local governments: A Q-methodological study
title_short Stakeholders, natural resource management and Australian rural local governments: A Q-methodological study
title_sort stakeholders, natural resource management and australian rural local governments: a q-methodological study
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/29060