No difference in gluteus medius activation in women with mild patellofemoral pain

CONTEXT: The gluteus medius (Gmed) is proposed to consist of 3 functional subdivisions (anterior, middle, and posterior). Gmed weakness and dysfunction have been implicated in numerous lower extremity disorders, including patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). PFPS is a knee condition that frequently...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: O'Sullivan, Keiran, Herbert, E., Sainsbury, David, McCreesh, K., Clifford, A.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Human Kinetics Publishers INC 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/28593
_version_ 1848752578883485696
author O'Sullivan, Keiran
Herbert, E.
Sainsbury, David
McCreesh, K.
Clifford, A.
author_facet O'Sullivan, Keiran
Herbert, E.
Sainsbury, David
McCreesh, K.
Clifford, A.
author_sort O'Sullivan, Keiran
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description CONTEXT: The gluteus medius (Gmed) is proposed to consist of 3 functional subdivisions (anterior, middle, and posterior). Gmed weakness and dysfunction have been implicated in numerous lower extremity disorders, including patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). PFPS is a knee condition that frequently occurs in females and is associated with activities such as squatting and stair climbing. There is a lack of evidence for the role of the subdivisions of the Gmed in females with and without PFPS. OBJECTIVE: To compare muscle activation in the 3 Gmed subdivisions during 4 weight-bearing exercises in women with and without PFPS. DESIGN: Single-session, repeated-measures observational study. SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 12 women with PFPS and 12 age- and gender-matched asymptomatic controls. INTERVENTION: Participants performed 4 weight-bearing exercises (wall press, pelvic drop, step-up-and-over, and unilateral squat) 3 times while surface electromyography (sEMG) activity of the Gmed segments was recorded.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: sEMG muscle activity for each functional subdivision of the Gmed during each weight-bearing exercise was analyzed using a mixed between-within-subjects ANOVA (post hoc Bonferroni). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in muscle activation were found between the PFPS and healthy participants (P = .97). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences between the exercises (P = .19) or muscle fibers (P = .36) independent of group analyzed. However, the activation of the subdivisions varied according to the exercise performed (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Similar levels of muscle activation were recorded in the Gmed subdivisions of the PFPS and healthy participants during the different exercises. This is the first study to examine all 3 Gmed subdivisions in PFPS. Future studies using larger sample sizes should also investigate onset and duration of muscle activation in all Gmed subdivisions in both healthy individuals and those with PFPS.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:10:51Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-28593
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:10:51Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Human Kinetics Publishers INC
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-285932017-01-30T13:05:57Z No difference in gluteus medius activation in women with mild patellofemoral pain O'Sullivan, Keiran Herbert, E. Sainsbury, David McCreesh, K. Clifford, A. CONTEXT: The gluteus medius (Gmed) is proposed to consist of 3 functional subdivisions (anterior, middle, and posterior). Gmed weakness and dysfunction have been implicated in numerous lower extremity disorders, including patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). PFPS is a knee condition that frequently occurs in females and is associated with activities such as squatting and stair climbing. There is a lack of evidence for the role of the subdivisions of the Gmed in females with and without PFPS. OBJECTIVE: To compare muscle activation in the 3 Gmed subdivisions during 4 weight-bearing exercises in women with and without PFPS. DESIGN: Single-session, repeated-measures observational study. SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 12 women with PFPS and 12 age- and gender-matched asymptomatic controls. INTERVENTION: Participants performed 4 weight-bearing exercises (wall press, pelvic drop, step-up-and-over, and unilateral squat) 3 times while surface electromyography (sEMG) activity of the Gmed segments was recorded.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: sEMG muscle activity for each functional subdivision of the Gmed during each weight-bearing exercise was analyzed using a mixed between-within-subjects ANOVA (post hoc Bonferroni). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in muscle activation were found between the PFPS and healthy participants (P = .97). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences between the exercises (P = .19) or muscle fibers (P = .36) independent of group analyzed. However, the activation of the subdivisions varied according to the exercise performed (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Similar levels of muscle activation were recorded in the Gmed subdivisions of the PFPS and healthy participants during the different exercises. This is the first study to examine all 3 Gmed subdivisions in PFPS. Future studies using larger sample sizes should also investigate onset and duration of muscle activation in all Gmed subdivisions in both healthy individuals and those with PFPS. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/28593 Human Kinetics Publishers INC restricted
spellingShingle O'Sullivan, Keiran
Herbert, E.
Sainsbury, David
McCreesh, K.
Clifford, A.
No difference in gluteus medius activation in women with mild patellofemoral pain
title No difference in gluteus medius activation in women with mild patellofemoral pain
title_full No difference in gluteus medius activation in women with mild patellofemoral pain
title_fullStr No difference in gluteus medius activation in women with mild patellofemoral pain
title_full_unstemmed No difference in gluteus medius activation in women with mild patellofemoral pain
title_short No difference in gluteus medius activation in women with mild patellofemoral pain
title_sort no difference in gluteus medius activation in women with mild patellofemoral pain
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/28593