The influence of plural dominance in aphasic word production

Background: Plural dominance refers to the relative difference between the frequencies of a word in its singular and plural forms. Most of the evidence for theoretical accounts of plural dominance has come from psycholinguistic perception experiments (e.g., Baayen, Burani, & Schreuder, 1996; Baa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Biedermann, Britta-Andrea, Lorenz, A., Beyersmann, E., Nickels, L.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/28482
_version_ 1848752549226610688
author Biedermann, Britta-Andrea
Lorenz, A.
Beyersmann, E.
Nickels, L.
author_facet Biedermann, Britta-Andrea
Lorenz, A.
Beyersmann, E.
Nickels, L.
author_sort Biedermann, Britta-Andrea
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Plural dominance refers to the relative difference between the frequencies of a word in its singular and plural forms. Most of the evidence for theoretical accounts of plural dominance has come from psycholinguistic perception experiments (e.g., Baayen, Burani, & Schreuder, 1996; Baayen, Dijkstra, & Schreuder, 1997; Baayen, Schreuder, & Sproat, 1998). Only a few studies have investigated the production side of dominance, even in unimpaired speakers (e.g., Baayen, Levelt, Schreuder, & Ernestus, 2008). To our knowledge there is only one published neuropsychological study from Luzzatti, Mondini, and Semenza (2001) that uses reading-aloud data from an Italian brain-impaired speaker. Although findings across paradigms are inconsistent, they do indicate that plural-dominant nouns behave differently from singular-dominant nouns, and therefore suggest a difference in representation.Aims: This paper investigates processing of plural nouns in aphasia with a specific focus on effects of dominance.Methods & Procedures: We carried out two single-case studies with two women with aphasia, FME and DRS, who showed word retrieval deficits in picture naming as a result of different underlying functional impairments. The main task of interest was picture naming of single and multiple objects in order to test effects of plural dominance. In addition, word-picture matching tested number representation in comprehension.Outcome & Results: DRS showed a specific morphological impairment with plural marking, whereas FME had no specific morphological deficit. The results are discussed in the framework of current psycholinguistic accounts on the representation and processing of plural nouns (e.g., Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999; Schreuder & Baayen, 1995).Conclusions: Different effects of plural dominance shown by both women with aphasia result from different underlying functional deficits, which indicate differences in the representation of plural dominance across processing levels. © 2012 Copyright 2012 Psychology Press, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:10:23Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-28482
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:10:23Z
publishDate 2012
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-284822017-09-13T15:19:35Z The influence of plural dominance in aphasic word production Biedermann, Britta-Andrea Lorenz, A. Beyersmann, E. Nickels, L. Background: Plural dominance refers to the relative difference between the frequencies of a word in its singular and plural forms. Most of the evidence for theoretical accounts of plural dominance has come from psycholinguistic perception experiments (e.g., Baayen, Burani, & Schreuder, 1996; Baayen, Dijkstra, & Schreuder, 1997; Baayen, Schreuder, & Sproat, 1998). Only a few studies have investigated the production side of dominance, even in unimpaired speakers (e.g., Baayen, Levelt, Schreuder, & Ernestus, 2008). To our knowledge there is only one published neuropsychological study from Luzzatti, Mondini, and Semenza (2001) that uses reading-aloud data from an Italian brain-impaired speaker. Although findings across paradigms are inconsistent, they do indicate that plural-dominant nouns behave differently from singular-dominant nouns, and therefore suggest a difference in representation.Aims: This paper investigates processing of plural nouns in aphasia with a specific focus on effects of dominance.Methods & Procedures: We carried out two single-case studies with two women with aphasia, FME and DRS, who showed word retrieval deficits in picture naming as a result of different underlying functional impairments. The main task of interest was picture naming of single and multiple objects in order to test effects of plural dominance. In addition, word-picture matching tested number representation in comprehension.Outcome & Results: DRS showed a specific morphological impairment with plural marking, whereas FME had no specific morphological deficit. The results are discussed in the framework of current psycholinguistic accounts on the representation and processing of plural nouns (e.g., Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999; Schreuder & Baayen, 1995).Conclusions: Different effects of plural dominance shown by both women with aphasia result from different underlying functional deficits, which indicate differences in the representation of plural dominance across processing levels. © 2012 Copyright 2012 Psychology Press, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/28482 10.1080/02687038.2012.660459 restricted
spellingShingle Biedermann, Britta-Andrea
Lorenz, A.
Beyersmann, E.
Nickels, L.
The influence of plural dominance in aphasic word production
title The influence of plural dominance in aphasic word production
title_full The influence of plural dominance in aphasic word production
title_fullStr The influence of plural dominance in aphasic word production
title_full_unstemmed The influence of plural dominance in aphasic word production
title_short The influence of plural dominance in aphasic word production
title_sort influence of plural dominance in aphasic word production
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/28482