Jones, B., & Elliffe, D. (2013). Matching-to-sample performance is better analyzed in terms of a four-term contingency than in terms of a three-term contingency. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationJones, Brent, and D. Elliffe. Matching-to-sample Performance Is Better Analyzed in Terms of a Four-term Contingency than in Terms of a Three-term Contingency. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc, 2013.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationJones, Brent, and D. Elliffe. Matching-to-sample Performance Is Better Analyzed in Terms of a Four-term Contingency than in Terms of a Three-term Contingency. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc, 2013.
Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.