A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function

Background. The 30-item Disabilities Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was introduced to facilitate assessment of upper limb functional limitations. To improve practicality and eliminate item redundancy a modified instrument was needed. The 11-item QuickDASH was developed to fulfil these re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabel, C., Yelland, M., Melloh, Markus, Burkett, B.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Biomed Central Ltd 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/27931
_version_ 1848752400126443520
author Gabel, C.
Yelland, M.
Melloh, Markus
Burkett, B.
author_facet Gabel, C.
Yelland, M.
Melloh, Markus
Burkett, B.
author_sort Gabel, C.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background. The 30-item Disabilities Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was introduced to facilitate assessment of upper limb functional limitations. To improve practicality and eliminate item redundancy a modified instrument was needed. The 11-item QuickDASH was developed to fulfil these requirements and translated into several languages. However, prospective investigations of psychometric and practical characteristics are limited. No published study investigated readability or used concurrent validation with a standardized upper limb criterion measure. The validity of the QuickDASH has been questioned as the results for factor structure are conflicting, and the English-language version has not yet had factor structure reported. A shortened 9-item version, the QuickDASH-9, that addresses these issues is proposed. Methods. This two-stage observational study assessed the psychometric and practical characteristics of the QuickDASH and the extracted QuickDASH-9. The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) was the criterion standard in both stages. Stage 1, calibration, reanalyzed extracted QuickDASH and QuickDASH-9 responses from a previous prospective study, by the authors, of the 30-item DASH (n = 137). Stage 2, prospective validation, investigated the QuickDASH through repeated measures in consecutive upper limb musculoskeletal participants' consulting for physical therapy in Australia (n = 67). The QuickDASH and extracted QuickDASH-9 data from both stages was analyzed and compared for psychometric properties, practical characteristics and factor structure. Results. The proposed QuickDASH-9 had a unidimensional structure, high reliability (ICC 2:1, r = 0.92), internal consistency (alpha = 0.93) and responsiveness (ES = 1.05). It correlated highly with both the DASH (r = 0.97), QuickDASH (r = 0.99) and ULFI criterion (r = 0.85). QuickDASH-9 missing responses reduced to 3.5% from 26% in the QuickDASH. Completion and scoring time was 134 ± 56 seconds and required a computational aid. The QuickDASH demonstrated a bidimensional structure making it invalid. The QuickDASH-9 summary performance was measured on the 'Measurement of Outcome Measures' at 88% and on the 'Bot' clinimetric scale at 75%. Conclusions. The proposed QuickDASH-9 had a unidimensional structure and similar psychometric precision to the full-length DASH with improved practicality and completion time. The QuickDASH was invalid as its bidimensional structure made a single summated score inappropriate. The QuickDASH-9 offers a future direction for ongoing use of the QuickDASH concept. © 2009 Gabel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:08:01Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-27931
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:08:01Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Biomed Central Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-279312017-09-13T15:11:18Z A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function Gabel, C. Yelland, M. Melloh, Markus Burkett, B. Background. The 30-item Disabilities Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was introduced to facilitate assessment of upper limb functional limitations. To improve practicality and eliminate item redundancy a modified instrument was needed. The 11-item QuickDASH was developed to fulfil these requirements and translated into several languages. However, prospective investigations of psychometric and practical characteristics are limited. No published study investigated readability or used concurrent validation with a standardized upper limb criterion measure. The validity of the QuickDASH has been questioned as the results for factor structure are conflicting, and the English-language version has not yet had factor structure reported. A shortened 9-item version, the QuickDASH-9, that addresses these issues is proposed. Methods. This two-stage observational study assessed the psychometric and practical characteristics of the QuickDASH and the extracted QuickDASH-9. The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) was the criterion standard in both stages. Stage 1, calibration, reanalyzed extracted QuickDASH and QuickDASH-9 responses from a previous prospective study, by the authors, of the 30-item DASH (n = 137). Stage 2, prospective validation, investigated the QuickDASH through repeated measures in consecutive upper limb musculoskeletal participants' consulting for physical therapy in Australia (n = 67). The QuickDASH and extracted QuickDASH-9 data from both stages was analyzed and compared for psychometric properties, practical characteristics and factor structure. Results. The proposed QuickDASH-9 had a unidimensional structure, high reliability (ICC 2:1, r = 0.92), internal consistency (alpha = 0.93) and responsiveness (ES = 1.05). It correlated highly with both the DASH (r = 0.97), QuickDASH (r = 0.99) and ULFI criterion (r = 0.85). QuickDASH-9 missing responses reduced to 3.5% from 26% in the QuickDASH. Completion and scoring time was 134 ± 56 seconds and required a computational aid. The QuickDASH demonstrated a bidimensional structure making it invalid. The QuickDASH-9 summary performance was measured on the 'Measurement of Outcome Measures' at 88% and on the 'Bot' clinimetric scale at 75%. Conclusions. The proposed QuickDASH-9 had a unidimensional structure and similar psychometric precision to the full-length DASH with improved practicality and completion time. The QuickDASH was invalid as its bidimensional structure made a single summated score inappropriate. The QuickDASH-9 offers a future direction for ongoing use of the QuickDASH concept. © 2009 Gabel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/27931 10.1186/1471-2474-10-161 Biomed Central Ltd unknown
spellingShingle Gabel, C.
Yelland, M.
Melloh, Markus
Burkett, B.
A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function
title A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function
title_full A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function
title_fullStr A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function
title_full_unstemmed A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function
title_short A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function
title_sort modified quickdash-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/27931