Zircon U–Pb–Lu–Hf–O isotopic evidence for =3.5 Ga crustal growth,reworking and differentiation in the northern Tarim Craton

Continental crust was largely generated before 2.5 Ga through mafic–ultramafic and TTG (tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite) magmatism, but it is contentious when did such primitive crust evolve into mature granodioritic to granitic composition similar to modern upper crust. Here we present zircon U–...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ge, Rongfeng, Zhu, W., Wilde, Simon, He, J.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier BV 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/27543
_version_ 1848752292619091968
author Ge, Rongfeng
Zhu, W.
Wilde, Simon
He, J.
author_facet Ge, Rongfeng
Zhu, W.
Wilde, Simon
He, J.
author_sort Ge, Rongfeng
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Continental crust was largely generated before 2.5 Ga through mafic–ultramafic and TTG (tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite) magmatism, but it is contentious when did such primitive crust evolve into mature granodioritic to granitic composition similar to modern upper crust. Here we present zircon U–Pb–Lu–Hf–O isotopic data for late Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks (the Xingditag Group) in the Kuruktag area, northern Tarim Craton, NW China. CL-imaging reveals core–rim structures for most zircons from a garnet-bearing paragneiss and a semi-pelitic schist, whereas two quartzites are dominated by metamorphic zircons. SHRIMP and/or LA-ICP-MS U–Pb dating yielded a range of detrital ages from ca. 2.0 to 3.5 Ga for the zircon cores and a consistent metamorphic age of ca. 1.93 Ga for the rims for the paragneiss and schist. However, zircons from the two quartzites mainly record a ca. 1.85 Ga metamorphic event; detrital zircons are rare or absent. These data confirm that the Xingditag Group was deposited after ca. 2.0 Ga and was metamorphosed at ca. 1.93 or 1.85 Ga. Importantly, the ca. 2.0–3.5 Ga concordant detrital zircons exhibit low initial 176Hf/177Hf ratios (as low as 0.28045) and high δ18O values (6.6–11.4‰). These values are interpreted as recording primary magmatic features of the basement rocks in the northern Tarim Craton, because: (1) the dominantly prismatic or fragmentary morphology, oscillatory zoning and moderate Th/U ratios of the detrital zircons indicate a local provenance dominated by igneous rocks; and (2) the within-grain and overall heterogeneities argue against Hf and O isotopic resetting during metamorphism. Linear regressions of the initial 176Hf/177Hf values of these detrital zircons yield a remarkably consistent 176Lu/177Hf ratio of 0.01 for the oldest (View the MathML source T DM 2 = 3.9 and 3.7 Ga) and youngest (View the MathML source T DM 2 = 2.8 Ga) crustal components. These observations suggest that significant amounts of felsic continental crust may have been formed, altered and reworked as early as ca. 3.5 Ga, marking crustal differentiation and maturation during the Paleoarchean. Hafnium crustal model ages reveal that the oldest crustal component in the northern Tarim Craton may have been generated before ca. 3.9 Ga, much earlier than previously thought.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:06:18Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-27543
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:06:18Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier BV
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-275432017-09-13T15:55:52Z Zircon U–Pb–Lu–Hf–O isotopic evidence for =3.5 Ga crustal growth,reworking and differentiation in the northern Tarim Craton Ge, Rongfeng Zhu, W. Wilde, Simon He, J. Crustal differentiation Zircon U–Pb–Lu–Hf–O isotopes Tarim Craton Crustal reworking Xingditag Group Crustal growth Continental crust was largely generated before 2.5 Ga through mafic–ultramafic and TTG (tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite) magmatism, but it is contentious when did such primitive crust evolve into mature granodioritic to granitic composition similar to modern upper crust. Here we present zircon U–Pb–Lu–Hf–O isotopic data for late Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks (the Xingditag Group) in the Kuruktag area, northern Tarim Craton, NW China. CL-imaging reveals core–rim structures for most zircons from a garnet-bearing paragneiss and a semi-pelitic schist, whereas two quartzites are dominated by metamorphic zircons. SHRIMP and/or LA-ICP-MS U–Pb dating yielded a range of detrital ages from ca. 2.0 to 3.5 Ga for the zircon cores and a consistent metamorphic age of ca. 1.93 Ga for the rims for the paragneiss and schist. However, zircons from the two quartzites mainly record a ca. 1.85 Ga metamorphic event; detrital zircons are rare or absent. These data confirm that the Xingditag Group was deposited after ca. 2.0 Ga and was metamorphosed at ca. 1.93 or 1.85 Ga. Importantly, the ca. 2.0–3.5 Ga concordant detrital zircons exhibit low initial 176Hf/177Hf ratios (as low as 0.28045) and high δ18O values (6.6–11.4‰). These values are interpreted as recording primary magmatic features of the basement rocks in the northern Tarim Craton, because: (1) the dominantly prismatic or fragmentary morphology, oscillatory zoning and moderate Th/U ratios of the detrital zircons indicate a local provenance dominated by igneous rocks; and (2) the within-grain and overall heterogeneities argue against Hf and O isotopic resetting during metamorphism. Linear regressions of the initial 176Hf/177Hf values of these detrital zircons yield a remarkably consistent 176Lu/177Hf ratio of 0.01 for the oldest (View the MathML source T DM 2 = 3.9 and 3.7 Ga) and youngest (View the MathML source T DM 2 = 2.8 Ga) crustal components. These observations suggest that significant amounts of felsic continental crust may have been formed, altered and reworked as early as ca. 3.5 Ga, marking crustal differentiation and maturation during the Paleoarchean. Hafnium crustal model ages reveal that the oldest crustal component in the northern Tarim Craton may have been generated before ca. 3.9 Ga, much earlier than previously thought. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/27543 10.1016/j.precamres.2014.05.004 Elsevier BV restricted
spellingShingle Crustal differentiation
Zircon U–Pb–Lu–Hf–O isotopes
Tarim Craton
Crustal reworking
Xingditag Group
Crustal growth
Ge, Rongfeng
Zhu, W.
Wilde, Simon
He, J.
Zircon U–Pb–Lu–Hf–O isotopic evidence for =3.5 Ga crustal growth,reworking and differentiation in the northern Tarim Craton
title Zircon U–Pb–Lu–Hf–O isotopic evidence for =3.5 Ga crustal growth,reworking and differentiation in the northern Tarim Craton
title_full Zircon U–Pb–Lu–Hf–O isotopic evidence for =3.5 Ga crustal growth,reworking and differentiation in the northern Tarim Craton
title_fullStr Zircon U–Pb–Lu–Hf–O isotopic evidence for =3.5 Ga crustal growth,reworking and differentiation in the northern Tarim Craton
title_full_unstemmed Zircon U–Pb–Lu–Hf–O isotopic evidence for =3.5 Ga crustal growth,reworking and differentiation in the northern Tarim Craton
title_short Zircon U–Pb–Lu–Hf–O isotopic evidence for =3.5 Ga crustal growth,reworking and differentiation in the northern Tarim Craton
title_sort zircon u–pb–lu–hf–o isotopic evidence for =3.5 ga crustal growth,reworking and differentiation in the northern tarim craton
topic Crustal differentiation
Zircon U–Pb–Lu–Hf–O isotopes
Tarim Craton
Crustal reworking
Xingditag Group
Crustal growth
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/27543