Self-management for osteoarthritis of the knee : Does mode of delivery influence outcome?

Background: Self-management has become increasingly popular in the management of chronic diseases. There are many different self-management models. Meta analyses of arthritis self-management have concluded that it is difficult to recommend any one program in preference to another due to inconsistenc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Coleman, Sophie, McQuade, J., Rose, J., Inderjeeth, C., Carroll, G., Briffa, Kathy
Format: Journal Article
Published: Biomed Central Ltd 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/26834
_version_ 1848752098218344448
author Coleman, Sophie
McQuade, J.
Rose, J.
Inderjeeth, C.
Carroll, G.
Briffa, Kathy
author_facet Coleman, Sophie
McQuade, J.
Rose, J.
Inderjeeth, C.
Carroll, G.
Briffa, Kathy
author_sort Coleman, Sophie
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Self-management has become increasingly popular in the management of chronic diseases. There are many different self-management models. Meta analyses of arthritis self-management have concluded that it is difficult to recommend any one program in preference to another due to inconsistencies in the study designs used to evaluate different programs. The Stanford Arthritis Self-Management Program (ASMP), most commonly delivered by trained lay leaders, is a generic program widely used for people with rheumatological disorders. We have developed a more specific program expressly for people with osteoarthritis of the knee (OAKP). It includes information designed to be delivered by health professionals and results in improvements in pain, function and quality of life. Aim: To determine whether, for people with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, the OAKP implemented in a primary health care setting can achieve and maintain clinically meaningful improvements in more participants than ASMP delivered in the same environment.Methods/Design: The effectiveness of the programs will be compared in a single-blind randomized study. Participants: 146 participants with established OA knee will be recruited. Volunteers with coexistent inflammatory joint disease or serious co-morbidities will be excluded. Interventions: Participants will be randomised into either OAKP or ASMP groups and followed for 6 months. Measurements: Assessments will be immediately before and after the intervention and at 6 months. Primary outcome measures will be WOMAC and SF-36 questionnaires and a VAS for pain. Secondary outcomes will include balance, tested using a timed single leg balance test and a timed step test and self-efficacy. Data will be analysed using repeated measures ANOVA. Discussion: With an aging population the health care costs for people with arthritis are ever increasing. Although cost analysis is beyond the scope of this study, it is reasonable to expect that costs will be greater when health professionals deliver self-management programs as opposed to lay leaders. Consequently it is critical to examine the relative effectiveness of the primary care management strategies available for OA.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:03:13Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-26834
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:03:13Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Biomed Central Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-268342017-09-13T15:29:11Z Self-management for osteoarthritis of the knee : Does mode of delivery influence outcome? Coleman, Sophie McQuade, J. Rose, J. Inderjeeth, C. Carroll, G. Briffa, Kathy Background: Self-management has become increasingly popular in the management of chronic diseases. There are many different self-management models. Meta analyses of arthritis self-management have concluded that it is difficult to recommend any one program in preference to another due to inconsistencies in the study designs used to evaluate different programs. The Stanford Arthritis Self-Management Program (ASMP), most commonly delivered by trained lay leaders, is a generic program widely used for people with rheumatological disorders. We have developed a more specific program expressly for people with osteoarthritis of the knee (OAKP). It includes information designed to be delivered by health professionals and results in improvements in pain, function and quality of life. Aim: To determine whether, for people with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, the OAKP implemented in a primary health care setting can achieve and maintain clinically meaningful improvements in more participants than ASMP delivered in the same environment.Methods/Design: The effectiveness of the programs will be compared in a single-blind randomized study. Participants: 146 participants with established OA knee will be recruited. Volunteers with coexistent inflammatory joint disease or serious co-morbidities will be excluded. Interventions: Participants will be randomised into either OAKP or ASMP groups and followed for 6 months. Measurements: Assessments will be immediately before and after the intervention and at 6 months. Primary outcome measures will be WOMAC and SF-36 questionnaires and a VAS for pain. Secondary outcomes will include balance, tested using a timed single leg balance test and a timed step test and self-efficacy. Data will be analysed using repeated measures ANOVA. Discussion: With an aging population the health care costs for people with arthritis are ever increasing. Although cost analysis is beyond the scope of this study, it is reasonable to expect that costs will be greater when health professionals deliver self-management programs as opposed to lay leaders. Consequently it is critical to examine the relative effectiveness of the primary care management strategies available for OA. 2010 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/26834 10.1186/1471-2474-11-56 Biomed Central Ltd unknown
spellingShingle Coleman, Sophie
McQuade, J.
Rose, J.
Inderjeeth, C.
Carroll, G.
Briffa, Kathy
Self-management for osteoarthritis of the knee : Does mode of delivery influence outcome?
title Self-management for osteoarthritis of the knee : Does mode of delivery influence outcome?
title_full Self-management for osteoarthritis of the knee : Does mode of delivery influence outcome?
title_fullStr Self-management for osteoarthritis of the knee : Does mode of delivery influence outcome?
title_full_unstemmed Self-management for osteoarthritis of the knee : Does mode of delivery influence outcome?
title_short Self-management for osteoarthritis of the knee : Does mode of delivery influence outcome?
title_sort self-management for osteoarthritis of the knee : does mode of delivery influence outcome?
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/26834