Fixing the truth defence jalopy in defamation law: Reform proposals to foster public interest speech
Ill repute afflicts the law of defamation in the media's eyes. It is widely perceived to be among the foremost threats to communication. This paper contends that the truth defence, in particular, has largely failed media defendants and, more importantly, Australian society at large. This paper...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Conference Paper |
| Published: |
Asian Media Information and Communication Centre (AMIC)
2010
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/26505 |
| _version_ | 1848752005728698368 |
|---|---|
| author | Fernandez, Joseph |
| author2 | Sundeep R Muppidi |
| author_facet | Sundeep R Muppidi Fernandez, Joseph |
| author_sort | Fernandez, Joseph |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Ill repute afflicts the law of defamation in the media's eyes. It is widely perceived to be among the foremost threats to communication. This paper contends that the truth defence, in particular, has largely failed media defendants and, more importantly, Australian society at large. This paper proposes selected reforms to the truth defence. These reforms include an elevated priority for the freedom of speech imperative in adjudicating defamation complaints where the matter complained about was published by a media defendant. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T08:01:45Z |
| format | Conference Paper |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-26505 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T08:01:45Z |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publisher | Asian Media Information and Communication Centre (AMIC) |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-265052017-01-30T12:53:47Z Fixing the truth defence jalopy in defamation law: Reform proposals to foster public interest speech Fernandez, Joseph Sundeep R Muppidi Ill repute afflicts the law of defamation in the media's eyes. It is widely perceived to be among the foremost threats to communication. This paper contends that the truth defence, in particular, has largely failed media defendants and, more importantly, Australian society at large. This paper proposes selected reforms to the truth defence. These reforms include an elevated priority for the freedom of speech imperative in adjudicating defamation complaints where the matter complained about was published by a media defendant. 2010 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/26505 Asian Media Information and Communication Centre (AMIC) restricted |
| spellingShingle | Fernandez, Joseph Fixing the truth defence jalopy in defamation law: Reform proposals to foster public interest speech |
| title | Fixing the truth defence jalopy in defamation law: Reform proposals to foster public interest speech |
| title_full | Fixing the truth defence jalopy in defamation law: Reform proposals to foster public interest speech |
| title_fullStr | Fixing the truth defence jalopy in defamation law: Reform proposals to foster public interest speech |
| title_full_unstemmed | Fixing the truth defence jalopy in defamation law: Reform proposals to foster public interest speech |
| title_short | Fixing the truth defence jalopy in defamation law: Reform proposals to foster public interest speech |
| title_sort | fixing the truth defence jalopy in defamation law: reform proposals to foster public interest speech |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/26505 |