Does muscle size matter?: The relationship between muscle size and strength in children with cerebral palsy

Purpose: To investigate the muscle size–strength relationship of the knee flexors and extensors in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) in relation to typically developing children (TD). Methods: Eighteen children with spastic Diplegia, Gross Motor Function Classification System I–III (mean 7 y...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reid, S., Pitcher, C., Williams, Sian, Licari, M., Valentine, J., Shipman, P., Elliott, Catherine
Format: Journal Article
Published: Informa Healthcare 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/26114
_version_ 1848751892028456960
author Reid, S.
Pitcher, C.
Williams, Sian
Licari, M.
Valentine, J.
Shipman, P.
Elliott, Catherine
author_facet Reid, S.
Pitcher, C.
Williams, Sian
Licari, M.
Valentine, J.
Shipman, P.
Elliott, Catherine
author_sort Reid, S.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Purpose: To investigate the muscle size–strength relationship of the knee flexors and extensors in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) in relation to typically developing children (TD). Methods: Eighteen children with spastic Diplegia, Gross Motor Function Classification System I–III (mean 7 y 5 mo SD 1 y 7 mo) and 19 TD children (mean 7 y 6 mo SD 1 y 9 mo) participated. Muscle volume (MV) and anatomical cross-sectional area (aCSA) were assessed using MRI. Measures of peak torque (PT) and work of the knee flexors and extensors were assessed isometrically and isokinetically using a Biodex dynamometer, and normalised to bodymass (Bm). Results: Children with CP were weaker than their TD peers across all torque variables (p < 0.05). MV and aCSA of the knee flexors (MV: p = 0.002; aCSA: p = 0.000) and extensors (MV: p = 0.003; aCSA: p < 0.0001) were smaller in children with CP. The relationship between muscle size and strength in children with CP was weaker than the TD children. The strongest relationship was between MV and isometric PT/Bm for TD children (r = 0.77–0.84), and between MV and isokinetic work (r = 0.70–0.72) for children with CP. Conclusions: Children with CP have smaller, weaker muscles than their TD peers. However, muscle size may only partially explain their decreased torque capacity. MV appears to be a better predictor of muscle work in children with CP than aCSA. This is an important area of research particularly in regard to treatment(s) that target muscle and strength in children with CP.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:59:56Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-26114
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:59:56Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Informa Healthcare
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-261142017-09-13T15:23:54Z Does muscle size matter?: The relationship between muscle size and strength in children with cerebral palsy Reid, S. Pitcher, C. Williams, Sian Licari, M. Valentine, J. Shipman, P. Elliott, Catherine muscle strength Cerebral palsy children muscle volume muscle strength-size relationship Purpose: To investigate the muscle size–strength relationship of the knee flexors and extensors in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) in relation to typically developing children (TD). Methods: Eighteen children with spastic Diplegia, Gross Motor Function Classification System I–III (mean 7 y 5 mo SD 1 y 7 mo) and 19 TD children (mean 7 y 6 mo SD 1 y 9 mo) participated. Muscle volume (MV) and anatomical cross-sectional area (aCSA) were assessed using MRI. Measures of peak torque (PT) and work of the knee flexors and extensors were assessed isometrically and isokinetically using a Biodex dynamometer, and normalised to bodymass (Bm). Results: Children with CP were weaker than their TD peers across all torque variables (p < 0.05). MV and aCSA of the knee flexors (MV: p = 0.002; aCSA: p = 0.000) and extensors (MV: p = 0.003; aCSA: p < 0.0001) were smaller in children with CP. The relationship between muscle size and strength in children with CP was weaker than the TD children. The strongest relationship was between MV and isometric PT/Bm for TD children (r = 0.77–0.84), and between MV and isokinetic work (r = 0.70–0.72) for children with CP. Conclusions: Children with CP have smaller, weaker muscles than their TD peers. However, muscle size may only partially explain their decreased torque capacity. MV appears to be a better predictor of muscle work in children with CP than aCSA. This is an important area of research particularly in regard to treatment(s) that target muscle and strength in children with CP. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/26114 10.3109/09638288.2014.935492 Informa Healthcare restricted
spellingShingle muscle strength
Cerebral palsy
children
muscle volume
muscle strength-size relationship
Reid, S.
Pitcher, C.
Williams, Sian
Licari, M.
Valentine, J.
Shipman, P.
Elliott, Catherine
Does muscle size matter?: The relationship between muscle size and strength in children with cerebral palsy
title Does muscle size matter?: The relationship between muscle size and strength in children with cerebral palsy
title_full Does muscle size matter?: The relationship between muscle size and strength in children with cerebral palsy
title_fullStr Does muscle size matter?: The relationship between muscle size and strength in children with cerebral palsy
title_full_unstemmed Does muscle size matter?: The relationship between muscle size and strength in children with cerebral palsy
title_short Does muscle size matter?: The relationship between muscle size and strength in children with cerebral palsy
title_sort does muscle size matter?: the relationship between muscle size and strength in children with cerebral palsy
topic muscle strength
Cerebral palsy
children
muscle volume
muscle strength-size relationship
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/26114