You Have My Word Confronting Critical Questions Involving Journalists’ Promises and Confidential Sources

Journalists’ reliance on confidential sources for their articles is a lynchpin of journalistic practice. If journalists are unable to provide certain sources anonymity, ‘it is likely that critical information benefiting the public will not be passed on’ (Wade, 2014, p. 555). Public debate is thereby...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fernandez, Joseph
Format: Journal Article
Published: Sage Journals 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25880
_version_ 1848751829226094592
author Fernandez, Joseph
author_facet Fernandez, Joseph
author_sort Fernandez, Joseph
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Journalists’ reliance on confidential sources for their articles is a lynchpin of journalistic practice. If journalists are unable to provide certain sources anonymity, ‘it is likely that critical information benefiting the public will not be passed on’ (Wade, 2014, p. 555). Public debate is thereby damaged as it ‘hides corruption, it undermines accountability and it fundamentally undermines the capacity for society to provide a safer, nurturing environment in which citizens can participate’ (ibid.). This article focuses on three important aspects of journalist source confidentiality: journalists’ authority to give confidentiality undertakings; the entry into such undertakings; and the types of sources, including the related question of who instigates such undertakings. This study draws on the results of an Australian survey conducted in 2014.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:58:56Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-25880
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:58:56Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Sage Journals
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-258802017-09-13T15:23:04Z You Have My Word Confronting Critical Questions Involving Journalists’ Promises and Confidential Sources Fernandez, Joseph Journalists’ reliance on confidential sources for their articles is a lynchpin of journalistic practice. If journalists are unable to provide certain sources anonymity, ‘it is likely that critical information benefiting the public will not be passed on’ (Wade, 2014, p. 555). Public debate is thereby damaged as it ‘hides corruption, it undermines accountability and it fundamentally undermines the capacity for society to provide a safer, nurturing environment in which citizens can participate’ (ibid.). This article focuses on three important aspects of journalist source confidentiality: journalists’ authority to give confidentiality undertakings; the entry into such undertakings; and the types of sources, including the related question of who instigates such undertakings. This study draws on the results of an Australian survey conducted in 2014. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25880 10.1177/1326365X15604947 Sage Journals fulltext
spellingShingle Fernandez, Joseph
You Have My Word Confronting Critical Questions Involving Journalists’ Promises and Confidential Sources
title You Have My Word Confronting Critical Questions Involving Journalists’ Promises and Confidential Sources
title_full You Have My Word Confronting Critical Questions Involving Journalists’ Promises and Confidential Sources
title_fullStr You Have My Word Confronting Critical Questions Involving Journalists’ Promises and Confidential Sources
title_full_unstemmed You Have My Word Confronting Critical Questions Involving Journalists’ Promises and Confidential Sources
title_short You Have My Word Confronting Critical Questions Involving Journalists’ Promises and Confidential Sources
title_sort you have my word confronting critical questions involving journalists’ promises and confidential sources
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25880