Thoracic spine extension mobility in young adults: Influence of subject position and spinal curvature

TTSTUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. TTOBJECTIVES: To examine extension mobility of the thoracic spine in young, asymptomatic adults, with particular reference to the influence of subject position and magnitude of the thoracic kyphosis. TTBACKGROUND: Impairment of thoracic extension motion is comm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edmondston, S., Waller, Rob, Vallin, P., Holthe, A., Noebauer, A., King, E.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25535
_version_ 1848751736413487104
author Edmondston, S.
Waller, Rob
Vallin, P.
Holthe, A.
Noebauer, A.
King, E.
author_facet Edmondston, S.
Waller, Rob
Vallin, P.
Holthe, A.
Noebauer, A.
King, E.
author_sort Edmondston, S.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description TTSTUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. TTOBJECTIVES: To examine extension mobility of the thoracic spine in young, asymptomatic adults, with particular reference to the influence of subject position and magnitude of the thoracic kyphosis. TTBACKGROUND: Impairment of thoracic extension motion is commonly associated with mechanical pain disorders in this region of the spine. Knowledge of normal thoracic mobility and the factors that may influence this motion is important in the evaluation and management of thoracic pain disorders. TTMETHODS: In 40 asymptomatic adults, the total and regional thoracic extension range of motion was measured using 2-dimensional photographic image analysis. Extension mobility was measured in standing, sitting, prone, and 4-point kneeling. The association between the magnitude of the habitual thoracic kyphosis and extension mobility was also examined. TTRESULTS: When measured from the habitual standing position, the mean range of flexion was 11.5° (3.7°) and mean extension range was 8.7° (3.7°). Thoracic extension was significantly greater in unloaded positions compared to loaded positions (P<.001). The standing thoracic kyphosis angle was significantly correlated with the end range thoracic extension angle in all positions (r = 0.63-0.79, P<.001). There was a poor correlation between the thoracic kyphosis angle and thoracic extension range of motion in all positions (r = 0.11-0.34, P>.06). TTCONCLUSION: When measured from the habitual standing position, thoracic extension range of motion in young individuals is small and poorly correlated with the magnitude of the standing thoracic kyphosis. Unloaded positions (4-point kneeling and prone), compared to positions that load the spine (standing and sitting), appear to promote a greater range of thoracic extension motion.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:57:28Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-25535
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:57:28Z
publishDate 2011
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-255352017-09-13T15:16:37Z Thoracic spine extension mobility in young adults: Influence of subject position and spinal curvature Edmondston, S. Waller, Rob Vallin, P. Holthe, A. Noebauer, A. King, E. TTSTUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. TTOBJECTIVES: To examine extension mobility of the thoracic spine in young, asymptomatic adults, with particular reference to the influence of subject position and magnitude of the thoracic kyphosis. TTBACKGROUND: Impairment of thoracic extension motion is commonly associated with mechanical pain disorders in this region of the spine. Knowledge of normal thoracic mobility and the factors that may influence this motion is important in the evaluation and management of thoracic pain disorders. TTMETHODS: In 40 asymptomatic adults, the total and regional thoracic extension range of motion was measured using 2-dimensional photographic image analysis. Extension mobility was measured in standing, sitting, prone, and 4-point kneeling. The association between the magnitude of the habitual thoracic kyphosis and extension mobility was also examined. TTRESULTS: When measured from the habitual standing position, the mean range of flexion was 11.5° (3.7°) and mean extension range was 8.7° (3.7°). Thoracic extension was significantly greater in unloaded positions compared to loaded positions (P<.001). The standing thoracic kyphosis angle was significantly correlated with the end range thoracic extension angle in all positions (r = 0.63-0.79, P<.001). There was a poor correlation between the thoracic kyphosis angle and thoracic extension range of motion in all positions (r = 0.11-0.34, P>.06). TTCONCLUSION: When measured from the habitual standing position, thoracic extension range of motion in young individuals is small and poorly correlated with the magnitude of the standing thoracic kyphosis. Unloaded positions (4-point kneeling and prone), compared to positions that load the spine (standing and sitting), appear to promote a greater range of thoracic extension motion. 2011 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25535 10.2519/jospt.2011.3456 unknown
spellingShingle Edmondston, S.
Waller, Rob
Vallin, P.
Holthe, A.
Noebauer, A.
King, E.
Thoracic spine extension mobility in young adults: Influence of subject position and spinal curvature
title Thoracic spine extension mobility in young adults: Influence of subject position and spinal curvature
title_full Thoracic spine extension mobility in young adults: Influence of subject position and spinal curvature
title_fullStr Thoracic spine extension mobility in young adults: Influence of subject position and spinal curvature
title_full_unstemmed Thoracic spine extension mobility in young adults: Influence of subject position and spinal curvature
title_short Thoracic spine extension mobility in young adults: Influence of subject position and spinal curvature
title_sort thoracic spine extension mobility in young adults: influence of subject position and spinal curvature
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25535