European neonatal intensive care nursing research priorities: An e-delphi study
Objective: This study aimed to identify and prioritise neonatal intensive care nursing research topics across Europe using an e-Delphi technique. Design: An e-Delphi technique with three questionnaire rounds was performed. Qualitative responses of round one were analysed by content analysis and rese...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25403 |
| _version_ | 1848751698245320704 |
|---|---|
| author | Wielenga, J. Tume, L. Latour, Jos van den Hoogen, A. |
| author_facet | Wielenga, J. Tume, L. Latour, Jos van den Hoogen, A. |
| author_sort | Wielenga, J. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Objective: This study aimed to identify and prioritise neonatal intensive care nursing research topics across Europe using an e-Delphi technique. Design: An e-Delphi technique with three questionnaire rounds was performed. Qualitative responses of round one were analysed by content analysis and research statements were generated to be ranged on importance on a scale of 1–6 (not important to most important). Setting: Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in 17 European countries. Population: NICU clinical nurses, managers, educators and researchers (n=75). Intervention: None. Main outcome measures: A list of 43 research statements in eight domains. Results: The six highest ranking statements (≥5.0 mean score) were related to prevention and reduction of pain (mean 5.49; SD 1.07), medication errors (mean 5.20; SD 1.13), end-of-life care (mean 5.05; SD 1.18), needs of parents and family (mean 5.04; SD 1.23), implementing evidence into nursing practice (mean 5.02; SD 1.03), and pain assessment (mean 5.02; SD 1.11). The research domains were prioritised and ranked: (1) pain and stress; (2) family centred care; (3) clinical nursing care practices; (4) quality and safety; (5) ethics; (6) respiratory and ventilation; (7) infection and inflammation; and (8) professional issues in neonatal intensive care nursing. Conclusions: The results of this study might support developing a nursing research strategy for the nursing section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care. In addition, this may promote more European researcher collaboratives for neonatal nursing research. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T07:56:51Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-25403 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T07:56:51Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-254032017-09-13T15:15:33Z European neonatal intensive care nursing research priorities: An e-delphi study Wielenga, J. Tume, L. Latour, Jos van den Hoogen, A. Objective: This study aimed to identify and prioritise neonatal intensive care nursing research topics across Europe using an e-Delphi technique. Design: An e-Delphi technique with three questionnaire rounds was performed. Qualitative responses of round one were analysed by content analysis and research statements were generated to be ranged on importance on a scale of 1–6 (not important to most important). Setting: Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in 17 European countries. Population: NICU clinical nurses, managers, educators and researchers (n=75). Intervention: None. Main outcome measures: A list of 43 research statements in eight domains. Results: The six highest ranking statements (≥5.0 mean score) were related to prevention and reduction of pain (mean 5.49; SD 1.07), medication errors (mean 5.20; SD 1.13), end-of-life care (mean 5.05; SD 1.18), needs of parents and family (mean 5.04; SD 1.23), implementing evidence into nursing practice (mean 5.02; SD 1.03), and pain assessment (mean 5.02; SD 1.11). The research domains were prioritised and ranked: (1) pain and stress; (2) family centred care; (3) clinical nursing care practices; (4) quality and safety; (5) ethics; (6) respiratory and ventilation; (7) infection and inflammation; and (8) professional issues in neonatal intensive care nursing. Conclusions: The results of this study might support developing a nursing research strategy for the nursing section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care. In addition, this may promote more European researcher collaboratives for neonatal nursing research. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25403 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306858 BMJ Publishing Group fulltext |
| spellingShingle | Wielenga, J. Tume, L. Latour, Jos van den Hoogen, A. European neonatal intensive care nursing research priorities: An e-delphi study |
| title | European neonatal intensive care nursing research priorities: An e-delphi study |
| title_full | European neonatal intensive care nursing research priorities: An e-delphi study |
| title_fullStr | European neonatal intensive care nursing research priorities: An e-delphi study |
| title_full_unstemmed | European neonatal intensive care nursing research priorities: An e-delphi study |
| title_short | European neonatal intensive care nursing research priorities: An e-delphi study |
| title_sort | european neonatal intensive care nursing research priorities: an e-delphi study |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25403 |