Mechanisms driving pre- and post-stressor repetitive negative thinking: Metacognitions, cognitive avoidance, and thought control

Background and objectives: Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) is common to multiple emotional disorders and occurs before, during, and following a stressor. One replicated difference between common forms of RNT such as worry and rumination is temporal orientation towards a stressor, with worry being...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McEvoy, Peter, Moulds, M., Mahoney, A.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier BV; North Holland 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25307
_version_ 1848751672430428160
author McEvoy, Peter
Moulds, M.
Mahoney, A.
author_facet McEvoy, Peter
Moulds, M.
Mahoney, A.
author_sort McEvoy, Peter
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background and objectives: Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) is common to multiple emotional disorders and occurs before, during, and following a stressor. One replicated difference between common forms of RNT such as worry and rumination is temporal orientation towards a stressor, with worry being more future-oriented and rumination more past-oriented. Different mechanisms may drive RNT at these different time points. The aim of Study 1 was to examine whether previously demonstrated relationships between post-stressor RNT and mechanisms theorized to drive engagement in RNT, including metacognitive beliefs, cognitive avoidance strategies, and thought control strategies, would be replicated with anticipatory (pre-stressor) RNT. The aim of Study 2 was to replicate these associations in a new sample that completed measures of both pre- and post-stressor RNT.Method: Participants in Study 1 (N = 175) completed the RNT-L in anticipation of a stressor, along with measures of metacognitive beliefs, cognitive avoidance strategies, and thought control strategies. Participants in Study 2 (N = 91) completed the measures both before and after a stressor. Results: Pre- and post-stressor RNT were significantly correlated with all three mechanism measures. Metacognitive beliefs that RNT is uncontrollable and dangerous, and the thought control strategy of punishment, were most consistently and uniquely associated with RNT at both time-points.Limitations: Replication with clinical samples and with reference to a broader array of stressors is required. The correlational design precluded causal conclusions.Conclusions: Common and possibly some distinct mechanisms drive RNT before and after a stressor.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:56:27Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-25307
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:56:27Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier BV; North Holland
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-253072019-02-19T04:28:02Z Mechanisms driving pre- and post-stressor repetitive negative thinking: Metacognitions, cognitive avoidance, and thought control McEvoy, Peter Moulds, M. Mahoney, A. Thought control Metacognitions Repetitive thinking Cognitive avoidance Transdiagnostic Background and objectives: Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) is common to multiple emotional disorders and occurs before, during, and following a stressor. One replicated difference between common forms of RNT such as worry and rumination is temporal orientation towards a stressor, with worry being more future-oriented and rumination more past-oriented. Different mechanisms may drive RNT at these different time points. The aim of Study 1 was to examine whether previously demonstrated relationships between post-stressor RNT and mechanisms theorized to drive engagement in RNT, including metacognitive beliefs, cognitive avoidance strategies, and thought control strategies, would be replicated with anticipatory (pre-stressor) RNT. The aim of Study 2 was to replicate these associations in a new sample that completed measures of both pre- and post-stressor RNT.Method: Participants in Study 1 (N = 175) completed the RNT-L in anticipation of a stressor, along with measures of metacognitive beliefs, cognitive avoidance strategies, and thought control strategies. Participants in Study 2 (N = 91) completed the measures both before and after a stressor. Results: Pre- and post-stressor RNT were significantly correlated with all three mechanism measures. Metacognitive beliefs that RNT is uncontrollable and dangerous, and the thought control strategy of punishment, were most consistently and uniquely associated with RNT at both time-points.Limitations: Replication with clinical samples and with reference to a broader array of stressors is required. The correlational design precluded causal conclusions.Conclusions: Common and possibly some distinct mechanisms drive RNT before and after a stressor. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25307 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.07.011 Elsevier BV; North Holland fulltext
spellingShingle Thought control
Metacognitions
Repetitive thinking
Cognitive avoidance
Transdiagnostic
McEvoy, Peter
Moulds, M.
Mahoney, A.
Mechanisms driving pre- and post-stressor repetitive negative thinking: Metacognitions, cognitive avoidance, and thought control
title Mechanisms driving pre- and post-stressor repetitive negative thinking: Metacognitions, cognitive avoidance, and thought control
title_full Mechanisms driving pre- and post-stressor repetitive negative thinking: Metacognitions, cognitive avoidance, and thought control
title_fullStr Mechanisms driving pre- and post-stressor repetitive negative thinking: Metacognitions, cognitive avoidance, and thought control
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms driving pre- and post-stressor repetitive negative thinking: Metacognitions, cognitive avoidance, and thought control
title_short Mechanisms driving pre- and post-stressor repetitive negative thinking: Metacognitions, cognitive avoidance, and thought control
title_sort mechanisms driving pre- and post-stressor repetitive negative thinking: metacognitions, cognitive avoidance, and thought control
topic Thought control
Metacognitions
Repetitive thinking
Cognitive avoidance
Transdiagnostic
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25307