Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: Perspectives of key stakeholders Psychosocial

Background: Palliative care standards advocate support for grieving caregivers, given that some bereaved people fail to integrate their loss, experience ongoing emotional suffering and adverse health outcomes. Research shows that bereavement support tends to be delivered on an ad hoc basis without f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sealey, M., O'Connor, Moira, Aoun, Samar, Breen, Lauren
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25014
_version_ 1848751589007818752
author Sealey, M.
O'Connor, Moira
Aoun, Samar
Breen, Lauren
author_facet Sealey, M.
O'Connor, Moira
Aoun, Samar
Breen, Lauren
author_sort Sealey, M.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Palliative care standards advocate support for grieving caregivers, given that some bereaved people fail to integrate their loss, experience ongoing emotional suffering and adverse health outcomes. Research shows that bereavement support tends to be delivered on an ad hoc basis without formal assessment of risk or need. To align support with need, assessment of bereavement risk is necessary. The overall aim is to develop a bereavement risk assessment model, based on a three-tiered public health model, congruent with palliative care bereavement standards for use in palliative care in Western Australia. The specific aim of this phase of the study was to explore the perspectives of key stakeholders and to highlight issues in relation to the practice of bereavement risk assessment in palliative care. Methods: Action research, a cyclical process that involves working collaboratively with stakeholders, was considered as the best method to effect feasible change in practice. The nine participants were multidisciplinary health professionals from five palliative care services, and a bereaved former caregiver. Data were obtained from participants via three 90 min group meetings conducted over five weeks. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to analyse data following each meeting until saturation was reached, and the research team was satisfied that the themes were congruent with research aims.Results: Existing measures were found unsuitable to assess bereavement risk in palliative care. Assessment following the patient's death presented substantial barriers, directing assessment to the pre-death period. Four themes were identified relating to issues in need of consideration to develop a risk assessment model. These were systems of care, encompassing logistics of contact with caregivers; gatekeeping; conflation between caregiver stress, burden and grief; and a way forward. Conclusions: These group discussions provide a data-driven explanation of the issues affecting bereavement risk assessment in palliative care settings. A number of barriers will need to be overcome before assessment can become routine practice. We recommend the development of a brief, pre-death caregiver self-report measure of bereavement risk that may empower caregivers, lead to early intervention, and allow staff to remain focused on patient care, reducing burden on staff and palliative care services.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:55:07Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-25014
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:55:07Z
publishDate 2015
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-250142017-09-13T15:19:08Z Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: Perspectives of key stakeholders Psychosocial Sealey, M. O'Connor, Moira Aoun, Samar Breen, Lauren Background: Palliative care standards advocate support for grieving caregivers, given that some bereaved people fail to integrate their loss, experience ongoing emotional suffering and adverse health outcomes. Research shows that bereavement support tends to be delivered on an ad hoc basis without formal assessment of risk or need. To align support with need, assessment of bereavement risk is necessary. The overall aim is to develop a bereavement risk assessment model, based on a three-tiered public health model, congruent with palliative care bereavement standards for use in palliative care in Western Australia. The specific aim of this phase of the study was to explore the perspectives of key stakeholders and to highlight issues in relation to the practice of bereavement risk assessment in palliative care. Methods: Action research, a cyclical process that involves working collaboratively with stakeholders, was considered as the best method to effect feasible change in practice. The nine participants were multidisciplinary health professionals from five palliative care services, and a bereaved former caregiver. Data were obtained from participants via three 90 min group meetings conducted over five weeks. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to analyse data following each meeting until saturation was reached, and the research team was satisfied that the themes were congruent with research aims.Results: Existing measures were found unsuitable to assess bereavement risk in palliative care. Assessment following the patient's death presented substantial barriers, directing assessment to the pre-death period. Four themes were identified relating to issues in need of consideration to develop a risk assessment model. These were systems of care, encompassing logistics of contact with caregivers; gatekeeping; conflation between caregiver stress, burden and grief; and a way forward. Conclusions: These group discussions provide a data-driven explanation of the issues affecting bereavement risk assessment in palliative care settings. A number of barriers will need to be overcome before assessment can become routine practice. We recommend the development of a brief, pre-death caregiver self-report measure of bereavement risk that may empower caregivers, lead to early intervention, and allow staff to remain focused on patient care, reducing burden on staff and palliative care services. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25014 10.1186/s12904-015-0046-7 fulltext
spellingShingle Sealey, M.
O'Connor, Moira
Aoun, Samar
Breen, Lauren
Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: Perspectives of key stakeholders Psychosocial
title Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: Perspectives of key stakeholders Psychosocial
title_full Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: Perspectives of key stakeholders Psychosocial
title_fullStr Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: Perspectives of key stakeholders Psychosocial
title_full_unstemmed Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: Perspectives of key stakeholders Psychosocial
title_short Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: Perspectives of key stakeholders Psychosocial
title_sort exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: perspectives of key stakeholders psychosocial
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25014