Confirmatory factor analysis of the neck disability index, comparing patients with whiplash associated disorders to a control group with non-specific neck pain

Purpose: The neck disability index (NDI) as a 10-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure is the most commonly used whiplash associated disorders (WAD) assessment tool. However, statistical rigor and factor structure are not definitive. To date, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) has not examined...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabel, C., Cuesta-Vargas, A., Barr, S., Black, S., Osborne, J., Melloh, Markus
Format: Journal Article
Published: Springer 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/24517
_version_ 1848751452749561856
author Gabel, C.
Cuesta-Vargas, A.
Barr, S.
Black, S.
Osborne, J.
Melloh, Markus
author_facet Gabel, C.
Cuesta-Vargas, A.
Barr, S.
Black, S.
Osborne, J.
Melloh, Markus
author_sort Gabel, C.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Purpose: The neck disability index (NDI) as a 10-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure is the most commonly used whiplash associated disorders (WAD) assessment tool. However, statistical rigor and factor structure are not definitive. To date, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) has not examined whether the factor structure generalizes across different groups (e.g., WAD versus non-WAD). This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the NDI in these population groups. Methods: This study used CFA to analyze NDI baseline-data for WAD (n = 804; 69 % females) and non-WAD (n = 963; 67 % females), each for the full sample and separate genders. Invariance analyses examined the NDI structure across the four groups. Results: Across both populations and gender subgroups the one-factor solutions consistently showed better model fit over two-factor solutions. The NDI was best characterized as one-dimensional and invariant across multiple sub-groups. Conclusion: The NDI remains a valid PRO in WAD populations that provides acceptable measurement of neck status that is appropriate for basic functional assessment across genders. However, it is recommended that both clinicians and researchers initiate the transition toward more rigorous and less ambiguous PRO measurement tools for WAD patients and research. This future graduated movement toward other PROs should consider both regional PROs and computerized decision support systems, initially measured concurrently with the NDI to establish ways to convert existing scored data prior to their singular use.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:52:57Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-24517
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:52:57Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-245172017-09-13T15:07:52Z Confirmatory factor analysis of the neck disability index, comparing patients with whiplash associated disorders to a control group with non-specific neck pain Gabel, C. Cuesta-Vargas, A. Barr, S. Black, S. Osborne, J. Melloh, Markus Purpose: The neck disability index (NDI) as a 10-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure is the most commonly used whiplash associated disorders (WAD) assessment tool. However, statistical rigor and factor structure are not definitive. To date, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) has not examined whether the factor structure generalizes across different groups (e.g., WAD versus non-WAD). This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the NDI in these population groups. Methods: This study used CFA to analyze NDI baseline-data for WAD (n = 804; 69 % females) and non-WAD (n = 963; 67 % females), each for the full sample and separate genders. Invariance analyses examined the NDI structure across the four groups. Results: Across both populations and gender subgroups the one-factor solutions consistently showed better model fit over two-factor solutions. The NDI was best characterized as one-dimensional and invariant across multiple sub-groups. Conclusion: The NDI remains a valid PRO in WAD populations that provides acceptable measurement of neck status that is appropriate for basic functional assessment across genders. However, it is recommended that both clinicians and researchers initiate the transition toward more rigorous and less ambiguous PRO measurement tools for WAD patients and research. This future graduated movement toward other PROs should consider both regional PROs and computerized decision support systems, initially measured concurrently with the NDI to establish ways to convert existing scored data prior to their singular use. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/24517 10.1007/s00586-016-4543-z Springer restricted
spellingShingle Gabel, C.
Cuesta-Vargas, A.
Barr, S.
Black, S.
Osborne, J.
Melloh, Markus
Confirmatory factor analysis of the neck disability index, comparing patients with whiplash associated disorders to a control group with non-specific neck pain
title Confirmatory factor analysis of the neck disability index, comparing patients with whiplash associated disorders to a control group with non-specific neck pain
title_full Confirmatory factor analysis of the neck disability index, comparing patients with whiplash associated disorders to a control group with non-specific neck pain
title_fullStr Confirmatory factor analysis of the neck disability index, comparing patients with whiplash associated disorders to a control group with non-specific neck pain
title_full_unstemmed Confirmatory factor analysis of the neck disability index, comparing patients with whiplash associated disorders to a control group with non-specific neck pain
title_short Confirmatory factor analysis of the neck disability index, comparing patients with whiplash associated disorders to a control group with non-specific neck pain
title_sort confirmatory factor analysis of the neck disability index, comparing patients with whiplash associated disorders to a control group with non-specific neck pain
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/24517