Methods for identification of isolated carbonate build-upsfrom seismic reflection data

Isolated carbonate buildups (ICBs) are commonly attractive exploration targets. However, identifying ICBs based only on seismic data can be difficult for a variety of reasons. These include poor-quality two-dimensional data and a basic similarity between ICBs and other features such as volcanoes, er...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Burgess, P., Winefield, P., Minzoni, M., Elders, Chris
Format: Journal Article
Published: American Association of Petroleum Geologists 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/24502
_version_ 1848751448335056896
author Burgess, P.
Winefield, P.
Minzoni, M.
Elders, Chris
author_facet Burgess, P.
Winefield, P.
Minzoni, M.
Elders, Chris
author_sort Burgess, P.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Isolated carbonate buildups (ICBs) are commonly attractive exploration targets. However, identifying ICBs based only on seismic data can be difficult for a variety of reasons. These include poor-quality two-dimensional data and a basic similarity between ICBs and other features such as volcanoes, erosional remnants, and tilted fault blocks. To address these difficulties and develop reliable methods to identify ICBs, 234 seismic images were analyzed. The images included proven ICBs and other features, such as folds, volcanoes, and basement highs, which may appear similar to ICBs when imaged in seismic data. From this analysis, 18 identification criteria were derived to distinguish ICBs from non-ICB features. These criteria can be grouped into four categories: regional constraints, analysis of basic seismic geometries, analysis of geophysical details, and finer-scale seismic geometries. Systematically assessing the criteria is useful because it requires critical evaluation of the evidence present in the available data, working from the large-scale regional geology to the fine details of seismic response. It is also useful to summarize the criteria as a numerical score to facilitate comparison between different examples and different classes of ICBs and non-ICBs. Our analysis of scores of different classes of features suggests that the criteria do have some discriminatory power, but significant challenges remain.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:52:53Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-24502
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:52:53Z
publishDate 2013
publisher American Association of Petroleum Geologists
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-245022017-02-28T01:47:58Z Methods for identification of isolated carbonate build-upsfrom seismic reflection data Burgess, P. Winefield, P. Minzoni, M. Elders, Chris seismic interpretation petroleum geology Carbonate buildups Isolated carbonate buildups (ICBs) are commonly attractive exploration targets. However, identifying ICBs based only on seismic data can be difficult for a variety of reasons. These include poor-quality two-dimensional data and a basic similarity between ICBs and other features such as volcanoes, erosional remnants, and tilted fault blocks. To address these difficulties and develop reliable methods to identify ICBs, 234 seismic images were analyzed. The images included proven ICBs and other features, such as folds, volcanoes, and basement highs, which may appear similar to ICBs when imaged in seismic data. From this analysis, 18 identification criteria were derived to distinguish ICBs from non-ICB features. These criteria can be grouped into four categories: regional constraints, analysis of basic seismic geometries, analysis of geophysical details, and finer-scale seismic geometries. Systematically assessing the criteria is useful because it requires critical evaluation of the evidence present in the available data, working from the large-scale regional geology to the fine details of seismic response. It is also useful to summarize the criteria as a numerical score to facilitate comparison between different examples and different classes of ICBs and non-ICBs. Our analysis of scores of different classes of features suggests that the criteria do have some discriminatory power, but significant challenges remain. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/24502 American Association of Petroleum Geologists restricted
spellingShingle seismic interpretation
petroleum geology
Carbonate buildups
Burgess, P.
Winefield, P.
Minzoni, M.
Elders, Chris
Methods for identification of isolated carbonate build-upsfrom seismic reflection data
title Methods for identification of isolated carbonate build-upsfrom seismic reflection data
title_full Methods for identification of isolated carbonate build-upsfrom seismic reflection data
title_fullStr Methods for identification of isolated carbonate build-upsfrom seismic reflection data
title_full_unstemmed Methods for identification of isolated carbonate build-upsfrom seismic reflection data
title_short Methods for identification of isolated carbonate build-upsfrom seismic reflection data
title_sort methods for identification of isolated carbonate build-upsfrom seismic reflection data
topic seismic interpretation
petroleum geology
Carbonate buildups
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/24502