Improving the confidence of ‘‘questioned versus known” fiber comparisons using microspectrophotometry and chemometrics

Microspectrophotometry followed by chemometric data analysis was conducted on pairs of visually similar blue acrylic fibers, simulating the ‘‘questioned versus known” scenarios often encountered in forensic casework. The relative similarity or dissimilarity of each pair was determined by employing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sauzier, Georgina, Reichard, E., van Bronswijk, Wilhelm, Lewis, Simon, Goodpaster, J.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier BV 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/24492
_version_ 1848751445431549952
author Sauzier, Georgina
Reichard, E.
van Bronswijk, Wilhelm
Lewis, Simon
Goodpaster, J.
author_facet Sauzier, Georgina
Reichard, E.
van Bronswijk, Wilhelm
Lewis, Simon
Goodpaster, J.
author_sort Sauzier, Georgina
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Microspectrophotometry followed by chemometric data analysis was conducted on pairs of visually similar blue acrylic fibers, simulating the ‘‘questioned versus known” scenarios often encountered in forensic casework. The relative similarity or dissimilarity of each pair was determined by employing principal component analysis, discriminant analysis and Fisher’s exact test. Comparison of fibers from within each set resulted in a correct inclusion result in 10 out of 11 scenarios, with the one false exclusion attributed to a lack of reproducibility in the spectra. Comparison of fibers from different sets resulted in a correct exclusion result in 108 of 110 scenarios, with two sets that shared identical dye combinations being indistinguishable. Although the presented methods are not infallible, they may nonetheless provide a path forward for forensic fiber examiners that has a more scientifically rigorous basis on which to support their findings in a court of law.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:52:50Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-24492
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:52:50Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier BV
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-244922018-03-29T09:08:00Z Improving the confidence of ‘‘questioned versus known” fiber comparisons using microspectrophotometry and chemometrics Sauzier, Georgina Reichard, E. van Bronswijk, Wilhelm Lewis, Simon Goodpaster, J. Microspectrophotometry followed by chemometric data analysis was conducted on pairs of visually similar blue acrylic fibers, simulating the ‘‘questioned versus known” scenarios often encountered in forensic casework. The relative similarity or dissimilarity of each pair was determined by employing principal component analysis, discriminant analysis and Fisher’s exact test. Comparison of fibers from within each set resulted in a correct inclusion result in 10 out of 11 scenarios, with the one false exclusion attributed to a lack of reproducibility in the spectra. Comparison of fibers from different sets resulted in a correct exclusion result in 108 of 110 scenarios, with two sets that shared identical dye combinations being indistinguishable. Although the presented methods are not infallible, they may nonetheless provide a path forward for forensic fiber examiners that has a more scientifically rigorous basis on which to support their findings in a court of law. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/24492 10.1016/j.forc.2016.08.001 Elsevier BV restricted
spellingShingle Sauzier, Georgina
Reichard, E.
van Bronswijk, Wilhelm
Lewis, Simon
Goodpaster, J.
Improving the confidence of ‘‘questioned versus known” fiber comparisons using microspectrophotometry and chemometrics
title Improving the confidence of ‘‘questioned versus known” fiber comparisons using microspectrophotometry and chemometrics
title_full Improving the confidence of ‘‘questioned versus known” fiber comparisons using microspectrophotometry and chemometrics
title_fullStr Improving the confidence of ‘‘questioned versus known” fiber comparisons using microspectrophotometry and chemometrics
title_full_unstemmed Improving the confidence of ‘‘questioned versus known” fiber comparisons using microspectrophotometry and chemometrics
title_short Improving the confidence of ‘‘questioned versus known” fiber comparisons using microspectrophotometry and chemometrics
title_sort improving the confidence of ‘‘questioned versus known” fiber comparisons using microspectrophotometry and chemometrics
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/24492