Acoustic characterisation of bycatch mitigation pingers on shark control nets in Queensland, Australia

The Queensland Shark Control Program (QSCP) uses pingers to prevent marine mammal entanglement in shark control nets along public beaches, in Queensland, Australia. Acoustic emissions of Fumunda F3 (designed for humpback whales) and F10 pingers (designed for dolphins) were measured and characterised...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erbe, Christine, McPherson, C.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Endang Species Res 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/24100
_version_ 1848751335805026304
author Erbe, Christine
McPherson, C.
author_facet Erbe, Christine
McPherson, C.
author_sort Erbe, Christine
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The Queensland Shark Control Program (QSCP) uses pingers to prevent marine mammal entanglement in shark control nets along public beaches, in Queensland, Australia. Acoustic emissions of Fumunda F3 (designed for humpback whales) and F10 pingers (designed for dolphins) were measured and characterised. The acoustic signals consisted of tones (3 and 10 kHz, respectively) and harmonic overtones emitted for about 400 ms every 5 to 6 s. Directivity was more pronounced for the overtones. Broadband source levels were up to 135 dB re 1 µPa at 1 m for all pingers at all angles. Ambient noise was recorded in the vicinity of shark nets for 3 wk each quarter of 1 yr. Fish choruses, migrating humpback whales, dolphins, snapping shrimp, boats, sandpumps, wind and wave noise were identified. Beyond 1.5 km, pingers no longer contributed significantly to the ambient noise budget. Sound propagation was modelled to relate received pinger tones to measured ambient levels and to estimate the potential detection of pingers by local marine mammals (humpback whales, dugongs, dolphins). Mean transmitted levels were predicted to be audible over up to a few 100 m in range (depending on species). With currently 3 to 4 pingers per shark net of 200 m length, existing pinger type and arrangement were modelled to be adequate, even for marine mammals swimming straight at a net at top speed. Additional behavioural studies or long-term monitoring are needed to determine pinger efficacy.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:51:06Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-24100
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:51:06Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Endang Species Res
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-241002017-09-13T13:56:21Z Acoustic characterisation of bycatch mitigation pingers on shark control nets in Queensland, Australia Erbe, Christine McPherson, C. Noise budget Bycatch Acoustic deterrence Pinger ADD The Queensland Shark Control Program (QSCP) uses pingers to prevent marine mammal entanglement in shark control nets along public beaches, in Queensland, Australia. Acoustic emissions of Fumunda F3 (designed for humpback whales) and F10 pingers (designed for dolphins) were measured and characterised. The acoustic signals consisted of tones (3 and 10 kHz, respectively) and harmonic overtones emitted for about 400 ms every 5 to 6 s. Directivity was more pronounced for the overtones. Broadband source levels were up to 135 dB re 1 µPa at 1 m for all pingers at all angles. Ambient noise was recorded in the vicinity of shark nets for 3 wk each quarter of 1 yr. Fish choruses, migrating humpback whales, dolphins, snapping shrimp, boats, sandpumps, wind and wave noise were identified. Beyond 1.5 km, pingers no longer contributed significantly to the ambient noise budget. Sound propagation was modelled to relate received pinger tones to measured ambient levels and to estimate the potential detection of pingers by local marine mammals (humpback whales, dugongs, dolphins). Mean transmitted levels were predicted to be audible over up to a few 100 m in range (depending on species). With currently 3 to 4 pingers per shark net of 200 m length, existing pinger type and arrangement were modelled to be adequate, even for marine mammals swimming straight at a net at top speed. Additional behavioural studies or long-term monitoring are needed to determine pinger efficacy. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/24100 10.3354/esr00467 Endang Species Res restricted
spellingShingle Noise budget
Bycatch
Acoustic deterrence
Pinger
ADD
Erbe, Christine
McPherson, C.
Acoustic characterisation of bycatch mitigation pingers on shark control nets in Queensland, Australia
title Acoustic characterisation of bycatch mitigation pingers on shark control nets in Queensland, Australia
title_full Acoustic characterisation of bycatch mitigation pingers on shark control nets in Queensland, Australia
title_fullStr Acoustic characterisation of bycatch mitigation pingers on shark control nets in Queensland, Australia
title_full_unstemmed Acoustic characterisation of bycatch mitigation pingers on shark control nets in Queensland, Australia
title_short Acoustic characterisation of bycatch mitigation pingers on shark control nets in Queensland, Australia
title_sort acoustic characterisation of bycatch mitigation pingers on shark control nets in queensland, australia
topic Noise budget
Bycatch
Acoustic deterrence
Pinger
ADD
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/24100