Dissolution of jarosite [KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6] at pH 2 and 8: Insights from batch experiments and computational modelling

Jarosite [KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6] is a mineral that is common in acidic, sulphate-rich environments, such as acid sulphate soils derived from pyrite-bearing sediments, weathering zones of sulphide ore deposits and acid mine or acid rock drainage (ARD/AMD) sites. The structure of jarosite is based on linear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wright, Kathleen, Smith, A., Hudson-Edwards, K., Dubbin, W.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier Science Ltd 2006
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23968
_version_ 1848751299608182784
author Wright, Kathleen
Smith, A.
Hudson-Edwards, K.
Dubbin, W.
author_facet Wright, Kathleen
Smith, A.
Hudson-Edwards, K.
Dubbin, W.
author_sort Wright, Kathleen
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Jarosite [KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6] is a mineral that is common in acidic, sulphate-rich environments, such as acid sulphate soils derived from pyrite-bearing sediments, weathering zones of sulphide ore deposits and acid mine or acid rock drainage (ARD/AMD) sites. The structure of jarosite is based on linear tetrahedral?octahedral?tetrahedral (T?O?T) sheets, made up from slightly distorted FeO6 octahedra and SO4 tetrahedra. Batch dissolution experiments carried out on synthetic jarosite at pH 2, to mimic environments affected by ARD/AMD, and at pH 8, to simulate ARD/AMD environments recently remediated with slaked lime (Ca(OH)2), suggest first order dissolution kinetics. Both dissolution reactions are incongruent, as revealed by non-ideal dissolution of the parent solids and, in the case of the pH 8 dissolution, because a secondary goethite precipitate forms on the surface of the dissolving jarosite grains. The pH 2 dissolution yields only aqueous K, Fe, and SO4. Aqueous, residual solid, and computational modelling of the jarosite structure and surfaces using the GULP and MARVIN codes, respectively, show for the first time that there is selective dissolution of the A- and T-sites, which contain K and SO4, respectively, relative to Fe, which is located deep within the T?O?T jarosite structure. These results have implications for the chemistry of ARD/AMD waters, and for understanding reaction pathways of ARD/AMD mineral dissolution.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:50:31Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-23968
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:50:31Z
publishDate 2006
publisher Elsevier Science Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-239682019-02-19T04:25:44Z Dissolution of jarosite [KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6] at pH 2 and 8: Insights from batch experiments and computational modelling Wright, Kathleen Smith, A. Hudson-Edwards, K. Dubbin, W. Jarosite [KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6] is a mineral that is common in acidic, sulphate-rich environments, such as acid sulphate soils derived from pyrite-bearing sediments, weathering zones of sulphide ore deposits and acid mine or acid rock drainage (ARD/AMD) sites. The structure of jarosite is based on linear tetrahedral?octahedral?tetrahedral (T?O?T) sheets, made up from slightly distorted FeO6 octahedra and SO4 tetrahedra. Batch dissolution experiments carried out on synthetic jarosite at pH 2, to mimic environments affected by ARD/AMD, and at pH 8, to simulate ARD/AMD environments recently remediated with slaked lime (Ca(OH)2), suggest first order dissolution kinetics. Both dissolution reactions are incongruent, as revealed by non-ideal dissolution of the parent solids and, in the case of the pH 8 dissolution, because a secondary goethite precipitate forms on the surface of the dissolving jarosite grains. The pH 2 dissolution yields only aqueous K, Fe, and SO4. Aqueous, residual solid, and computational modelling of the jarosite structure and surfaces using the GULP and MARVIN codes, respectively, show for the first time that there is selective dissolution of the A- and T-sites, which contain K and SO4, respectively, relative to Fe, which is located deep within the T?O?T jarosite structure. These results have implications for the chemistry of ARD/AMD waters, and for understanding reaction pathways of ARD/AMD mineral dissolution. 2006 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23968 10.1016/j.gca.2005.09.024 Elsevier Science Ltd fulltext
spellingShingle Wright, Kathleen
Smith, A.
Hudson-Edwards, K.
Dubbin, W.
Dissolution of jarosite [KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6] at pH 2 and 8: Insights from batch experiments and computational modelling
title Dissolution of jarosite [KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6] at pH 2 and 8: Insights from batch experiments and computational modelling
title_full Dissolution of jarosite [KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6] at pH 2 and 8: Insights from batch experiments and computational modelling
title_fullStr Dissolution of jarosite [KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6] at pH 2 and 8: Insights from batch experiments and computational modelling
title_full_unstemmed Dissolution of jarosite [KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6] at pH 2 and 8: Insights from batch experiments and computational modelling
title_short Dissolution of jarosite [KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6] at pH 2 and 8: Insights from batch experiments and computational modelling
title_sort dissolution of jarosite [kfe3(so4)2(oh)6] at ph 2 and 8: insights from batch experiments and computational modelling
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23968