An Efficiency Rationale for Expenditure Equalization

This paper provides an efficiency rationale for expenditure equalization in federations. It does so by developing a fiscal federalism model with two citizen types; immobile non-workers and mobile workers. Three decision-makers, a federal transfer authority and two states, play a game as Nash compe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petchey, Jeffrey, Petchey, James
Format: Working Paper
Published: Centre for Research in Applied Economics 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23544
_version_ 1848751180589563904
author Petchey, Jeffrey
Petchey, James
author_facet Petchey, Jeffrey
Petchey, James
author_sort Petchey, Jeffrey
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This paper provides an efficiency rationale for expenditure equalization in federations. It does so by developing a fiscal federalism model with two citizen types; immobile non-workers and mobile workers. Three decision-makers, a federal transfer authority and two states, play a game as Nash competitors. In any Nash Equilibrium the federal authority chooses an efficient transfer that 'equalizes' for inter-state differences in state benefit and redistributive taxes as well as differences in per capita revenues (economic rents). Since state taxes are equal to per capita state expenditures on services this provides an efficiency rationale for expenditure equalization. Using examples it is shown that Australian equalization gets expenditure equalization in the 'right' direction from an efficiency perspective; from low to high cost states. This is not to say, however, that the magnitude of inter-state transfers induced by expenditure equalization in Australia is efficient.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:48:38Z
format Working Paper
id curtin-20.500.11937-23544
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:48:38Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Centre for Research in Applied Economics
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-235442017-02-28T01:37:07Z An Efficiency Rationale for Expenditure Equalization Petchey, Jeffrey Petchey, James migration federation efficiency fiscal equalization inter-state transfers This paper provides an efficiency rationale for expenditure equalization in federations. It does so by developing a fiscal federalism model with two citizen types; immobile non-workers and mobile workers. Three decision-makers, a federal transfer authority and two states, play a game as Nash competitors. In any Nash Equilibrium the federal authority chooses an efficient transfer that 'equalizes' for inter-state differences in state benefit and redistributive taxes as well as differences in per capita revenues (economic rents). Since state taxes are equal to per capita state expenditures on services this provides an efficiency rationale for expenditure equalization. Using examples it is shown that Australian equalization gets expenditure equalization in the 'right' direction from an efficiency perspective; from low to high cost states. This is not to say, however, that the magnitude of inter-state transfers induced by expenditure equalization in Australia is efficient. 2013 Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23544 Centre for Research in Applied Economics fulltext
spellingShingle migration
federation
efficiency
fiscal equalization
inter-state transfers
Petchey, Jeffrey
Petchey, James
An Efficiency Rationale for Expenditure Equalization
title An Efficiency Rationale for Expenditure Equalization
title_full An Efficiency Rationale for Expenditure Equalization
title_fullStr An Efficiency Rationale for Expenditure Equalization
title_full_unstemmed An Efficiency Rationale for Expenditure Equalization
title_short An Efficiency Rationale for Expenditure Equalization
title_sort efficiency rationale for expenditure equalization
topic migration
federation
efficiency
fiscal equalization
inter-state transfers
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23544