Outcomes in patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery

Background - Urgent surgery for acute intestinal presentations is generally associated with worse outcomes than elective procedures. This study assessed the outcomes of patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery. Methods - Patients were identified from a prospective database. Surgery was classifi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teloken, P., Spilsbury, Katrina, Levitt, M., Makin, G., Salama, P., Tan, P., Penter, C., Platell, C.
Format: Journal Article
Published: John Wiley & Sons 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23319
_version_ 1848751117493600256
author Teloken, P.
Spilsbury, Katrina
Levitt, M.
Makin, G.
Salama, P.
Tan, P.
Penter, C.
Platell, C.
author_facet Teloken, P.
Spilsbury, Katrina
Levitt, M.
Makin, G.
Salama, P.
Tan, P.
Penter, C.
Platell, C.
author_sort Teloken, P.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background - Urgent surgery for acute intestinal presentations is generally associated with worse outcomes than elective procedures. This study assessed the outcomes of patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery. Methods - Patients were identified from a prospective database. Surgery was classified as urgent when performed as soon as possible after resuscitation and usually within 24 h. Outcome measures included 30 days mortality, return to theatre, anastomotic leak and overall survival. Results - Two hundred forty-nine patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range 48–74). The most common presentations were obstruction (52.2%) and perforation (23.6%). Cancer was the disease process responsible for presentation in 47.8% of patients. Thirty-day mortality was 6.8%. Age (odds ratio 1.08 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.15; P = 0.01), American Society of Anesthesiologists 4 (odds ratio 7.14 95% CI 1.67–30.4; P = 0.008) and cancer (odds ratio 6.61 95% CI 1.53–28.45; P = 0.011) were independent predictors of 30 days mortality. Relaparotomy was required in six (2.4%) cases. A primary anastomosis was performed in 156 (62.6%) patients. Anastomotic leak occurred in four (2.5%) patients. In patients with cancer, overall 5-year survival was 28% (95% CI 19–37), corresponding to 54% (95% CI 35–70) for stages I and II, 50% (95% CI 24–71) for stage III and 6% (95% CI 1–17) for stage IV disease. Urgent surgery was independently associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 2.65; 95% CI 1.76–3.99; P < 0.001). Conclusion - In patients undergoing an urgent resection within a colorectal unit, performing a primary anastomosis is feasible and safe in the majority, relaparotomies are required in a minority and urgent surgery is an important predictor of worse prognosis in those with colorectal cancer.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:47:38Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-23319
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:47:38Z
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley & Sons
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-233192019-02-19T05:35:00Z Outcomes in patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery Teloken, P. Spilsbury, Katrina Levitt, M. Makin, G. Salama, P. Tan, P. Penter, C. Platell, C. anastomotic leak urgent surgery colorectal surgery postoperative mortality colorectal cancer survival Background - Urgent surgery for acute intestinal presentations is generally associated with worse outcomes than elective procedures. This study assessed the outcomes of patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery. Methods - Patients were identified from a prospective database. Surgery was classified as urgent when performed as soon as possible after resuscitation and usually within 24 h. Outcome measures included 30 days mortality, return to theatre, anastomotic leak and overall survival. Results - Two hundred forty-nine patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range 48–74). The most common presentations were obstruction (52.2%) and perforation (23.6%). Cancer was the disease process responsible for presentation in 47.8% of patients. Thirty-day mortality was 6.8%. Age (odds ratio 1.08 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.15; P = 0.01), American Society of Anesthesiologists 4 (odds ratio 7.14 95% CI 1.67–30.4; P = 0.008) and cancer (odds ratio 6.61 95% CI 1.53–28.45; P = 0.011) were independent predictors of 30 days mortality. Relaparotomy was required in six (2.4%) cases. A primary anastomosis was performed in 156 (62.6%) patients. Anastomotic leak occurred in four (2.5%) patients. In patients with cancer, overall 5-year survival was 28% (95% CI 19–37), corresponding to 54% (95% CI 35–70) for stages I and II, 50% (95% CI 24–71) for stage III and 6% (95% CI 1–17) for stage IV disease. Urgent surgery was independently associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 2.65; 95% CI 1.76–3.99; P < 0.001). Conclusion - In patients undergoing an urgent resection within a colorectal unit, performing a primary anastomosis is feasible and safe in the majority, relaparotomies are required in a minority and urgent surgery is an important predictor of worse prognosis in those with colorectal cancer. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23319 10.1111/ans.12580 John Wiley & Sons fulltext
spellingShingle anastomotic leak
urgent surgery
colorectal surgery
postoperative mortality
colorectal cancer survival
Teloken, P.
Spilsbury, Katrina
Levitt, M.
Makin, G.
Salama, P.
Tan, P.
Penter, C.
Platell, C.
Outcomes in patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery
title Outcomes in patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery
title_full Outcomes in patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery
title_fullStr Outcomes in patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes in patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery
title_short Outcomes in patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery
title_sort outcomes in patients undergoing urgent colorectal surgery
topic anastomotic leak
urgent surgery
colorectal surgery
postoperative mortality
colorectal cancer survival
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23319