Print Serial Cancellations in University Libraries Post 1990: What do the CAUL Statistics Reveal?

Recent reports on Australia's research infrastructure have highlighted the decline in serial subscriptions in academic and research libraries during the 1990s. They have used the annual CAUL statistics in order to support these claims. This article examines the CAUL statistics for serial subscr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Genoni, Paul
Format: Journal Article
Published: Australian Library and Information Association 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23286
_version_ 1848751108271374336
author Genoni, Paul
author_facet Genoni, Paul
author_sort Genoni, Paul
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Recent reports on Australia's research infrastructure have highlighted the decline in serial subscriptions in academic and research libraries during the 1990s. They have used the annual CAUL statistics in order to support these claims. This article examines the CAUL statistics for serial subscriptions, indicating their numerous flaws when used for longitudinal analysis. Alternative interpretations of the statistics are provided, which provide some evidence that rates of subscriptions to print periodicals were sustained for a longer period than previous uses of the data have suggested.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:47:29Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-23286
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:47:29Z
publishDate 2004
publisher Australian Library and Information Association
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-232862017-01-30T12:36:27Z Print Serial Cancellations in University Libraries Post 1990: What do the CAUL Statistics Reveal? Genoni, Paul Australian Library statistics CAUL statistics Serial Cancellations Recent reports on Australia's research infrastructure have highlighted the decline in serial subscriptions in academic and research libraries during the 1990s. They have used the annual CAUL statistics in order to support these claims. This article examines the CAUL statistics for serial subscriptions, indicating their numerous flaws when used for longitudinal analysis. Alternative interpretations of the statistics are provided, which provide some evidence that rates of subscriptions to print periodicals were sustained for a longer period than previous uses of the data have suggested. 2004 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23286 Australian Library and Information Association fulltext
spellingShingle Australian Library statistics
CAUL statistics
Serial Cancellations
Genoni, Paul
Print Serial Cancellations in University Libraries Post 1990: What do the CAUL Statistics Reveal?
title Print Serial Cancellations in University Libraries Post 1990: What do the CAUL Statistics Reveal?
title_full Print Serial Cancellations in University Libraries Post 1990: What do the CAUL Statistics Reveal?
title_fullStr Print Serial Cancellations in University Libraries Post 1990: What do the CAUL Statistics Reveal?
title_full_unstemmed Print Serial Cancellations in University Libraries Post 1990: What do the CAUL Statistics Reveal?
title_short Print Serial Cancellations in University Libraries Post 1990: What do the CAUL Statistics Reveal?
title_sort print serial cancellations in university libraries post 1990: what do the caul statistics reveal?
topic Australian Library statistics
CAUL statistics
Serial Cancellations
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23286